October 28, 2007
-
Preventing Terrorism
Andrew Sullivan was on Bill Maher’s show the other day and he said he had two questions for the Republican candidates: “If you could go back in time and abort Osama Bin Laden would you do it? The other is that if you could prevent a terrorist attack by having sex with a man would you do it?” Here is the link: Link
If you could prevent a terrorist attack by having sex with someone of your same sex would you do it?
Comments (97)
bah
Suree. =D
yes
More questions dealing with homosexual behavior? Gosh!
I believe I would.
NO!
I doubt that I could tire a man THAT much.
I’d just offer myself, then when he drops his drawers (or lifts his sheet), I’d whack his nuts off and let him bleed to death. Stinkin’ Islamo-fascists wanting gay sex.
of course.
hopefully someone will explain it to my SO, though…
HA. i’d probably do it for less. ahem.
To thwart a terrorist attack, sure. If it would save lives, I would definitely do it.
Gah! I’d have to =/.
sure would
heck I’d have a giant lesbian orgy and film it
this is the most ridiculous thing i’ve ever heard in a long time.
Only if that cunt Ann Coulter watched me do it.
What is with the homosexual obsession? According to the US census, homosexuals make up only 4% of the population. But they must be at lest 30% of the political discussions these days.
From the days when homosexually was called “the love that dare not speak its name” to now, were homosexuality has become the love that never shuts up.
Sure thing. Would I get to see Ann Coulter’s face when she found out? That would just be a perk.
fuck the attitude of the greater good. what’s wrong is wrong.
and i’d rather let my actions of not doing anything let a terrorist attack occur than to break any moral codes by doing so.
i wouldnt enjoy it. but yea, probably.
“From the days when homosexually was called “the love that dare not speak its name” to now, were homosexuality has become the love that never shuts up.”
Paige you never cease to entertain me
What kind of question is that.
Totally
and do I win a million bucks if I stand on my head and spit nickels? Just asking because a question as stupid as the one asked in this post deserves an answer at least as equally stupid
Paige wishes she had Ann Coulter going on.
Hell yeah!
That is completely illogical… but sure? I’m getting sick of the constant political discussion about gay/bi/whatever people. We’re making such a huge deal out of nothing. Leave the gays alone!!!!!
No offense to anyone….
but *&^$%*&%&^(*&^() no!!!
Well, that’s a loaded, irrelevant question imo.
No, sorry the attack will happen if it’s up to me
I wouldn’t abort Bin Laden nor would I sleep with a man to stop terrorism.
RYC: that one is his
I’d be interested in how the candidates answer this one.
I would only if the other woman was hot. If I have to have sex with an uggo, just let the terrorists bomb my home.
Those are both useless questions.
“From the days when homosexually was called “the love that dare not
speak its name” to now, were homosexuality has become the love that
never shuts up.”
Paige – you really made me laugh at this one. An excellent point.
You already know my answer. I would make my own xanga TV webcast. Benjimon making America safer while promoting the shadowy gay agenda.
I could put it on right after yours. Would you be so kind as to post it so I could get some traffic? “See Ben have sex with a man to stop a terrorist attack, it’s on right now. Come on by.”
But actually no.
I don’t think someone that is willing to strap a bomb to themselves is going to be frightened by a little gay sex.
“Before I blew up the airport I decided to take a piss, but there were people having sex in the bathroom. One of them even waved at me from underneath the next stall. I had to get out of there…”
can they be hot?
Absolutely not.
I’d would want to help but I would NOT do that.
I don’t see how doing that would make anything better anyway..
How stupid..
Sick man you are…That is a very good dilemma…poor people…no…I’ll ask a girl to do it for me…
yeah haha ew
Sure, why not?
Sex with a woman and save lives vs. no sex and people die…. I’d have sex with most anyone if it would prevent another 9/11. It would be horrible and degrading but….. I would probably do it. Does that make me in some way a bad person?
what fun yeah
EisforEdumund
fuck the attitude of the greater good. what’s wrong is wrong. and i’d rather let my actions of not doing anything let a terrorist attack occur than to break any moral codes by doing so.
If indiscriminate murder in terrorism does not qualify as breaking of moral code, then I’d be very frightened by people like you floating around in our society.
hell no Lol
My question to Andrew Sullivan is: Would you renounce your homosexual lifestyle if it would prevent a terrorist attack?
no, no, no, no, no, no, NO!!!!!!!
I’m a lesbian, so sure!!!
I already do lol.
No, I don’t think so, but I could make them a nice batch of cookies. You know, in the name of world peace.
Never compromise with terrorists.
Can’t I just do it anyway???
you bet your bottom dollar.
Yeah. I’d have sex with someone of the same sex anyway. =P
This is a ridiculous question
in the terrorist society, women have no say so i wouldn’t have to screw a woman.
umm
what kind of a question is that?
What a way to save the world…..
Um, no, I’ve been taught never to bargain with terrorists.
LoL, I couldn’t – but I don’t have any problem with someone else doing it.
Probably
No and no.
I am only responsible for my own actions. I cannot do a wrong in order to prevent a wrong: evil must be overcome with good.
Those questions are completely missing the point. Liberal politics make me laugh…
Heh, sure.
What a great reason.
And if I could pick the woman, even better.
“We just have to, Angelina, it’s for the good of the nation.”
Uh.
No.
It wouldn’t prevent a terrorist attack.
Psh.
So I’d end up having gay sex for… nothing.
And gay sex REALLY grosses me out.
Nope.
No. I don’t believe in situational ethics because I believe that God is sovereign. I will just obey his commandments and trust Him to take care of the rest. To break God’s laws for what I think is the ‘greater good’ would be presumption on my part.
Now ask me if I’d be willing to end a disastrous, world-policing foreign policy to prevent terrorist attacks.
well, i’m bisexual, so sure.
Yes. Other’s lives are worth more.
*others’
Hell NO!
Actually I rather like the idea of another terrorist attack it might actually get people to realize that we are being completely absurd with the measures we have taken to ensure out security and it might get the two parties to stop fighting at least for a day or two.
Probably. Human lives are worth more than my pride.
But they better be damn sure it will stop the attack.
Depends on who it was.
However, probably not, unless I know I will die in the terrorist attacks. (Better to be raped than killed.)
They would have to be a pretty damn well convincing transvestite and an attractive one at that.
how is that suppose to prevent a terrorist attack? i mean, muslims dont hold up homosexuality, so you arent giving into any islamofacist demands, i mean i cant see alqueida being appeased by that. only thing i can think of is that they are homosexual activist extremists, who want to “prove” their deviance is ok by forcing others to participate. and since i dont give even the slightest credence to terrorists(even on a personal level, once you threaten me, “talking” and “negotiation” are permenantly off the table,) i would say tract down the gay terrorists and eliminate them with extreme predjiduce(pun not intended). then, to paraphrase mr travolta in “swordfish”, “maybe the next guy will think twice about setting off that bomb”
Great questions!
And yes.
Yes. But I wouldn’t inhale.
would I be a victim in said terrorist attack? If not, then fuck that shit.
If I could go back in time and foresee the future; that Osama Bin Laden would pull that 9-11 stunt, then I would not abort him; rather, I’d take care to raise him in a good, moral home with loving partents who have a prettier opinion of the United States.
If I could prevent a terrorist atttack by sleeping with another chick, I could obviously see the terrorist attack ahead of time and would do my best to find other ways to prevent it.
absolutely not. And gays only comprise about 1% of the population. “The love that never shuts up”…….I love it.
Are you looking for tricks, sir? Because you’re barking up the wrong tree methinks.
Holy crap!
no
“If I could go back in time and foresee the future; that Osama Bin Laden would pull that 9-11 stunt, then I would not abort him; rather, I’d take care to raise him in a good, moral home with loving partents who have a prettier opinion of the United States.”
i was going to address this question as well, but sunny said it better than i ever could. it seems that at best andrew sullivan is a moron and at worst a deceptive sack of excrement. the first question presupposes that ones life is set before they are born, that murdering a child could possibly be justified by claiming that they would have turned out to be a serial killer.(putting aside abortion for a moment, if we are taking seriously the premise of predicting the future crimes of an individual and terminating them as a means of prevention, much like “minority report”, then it stands to reason a child could be psychologically profiled and executed to suit this need under the premise of the question) it kind of blows the cover of the liberal agenda if you have the brain to actually consider it. the point of the question being to trap the pro-life individual into either A) sounding like they support terrorism or B)question their stance on the issue of life. when in fact, the very question it’self is a murderous deception. it states you have an oportunity to change the future, but you can only change the future by violating your concience. not through, “education, discorse and opportunity” things that liberals blame the absense of for crime rates, but rather through finding a “violator” and killing him while he is still defensless.
the second question again relies on the one being asked to be completely braindead(much like liberals themselves) in order to invoke the required response. if you say ”no” you support terrorism, if you say “yes” then “oooh gay sex not so bad..” but the death knell of this question is the relevant question… how is gay sex suppose to stop a terrorist attack? is that the demand of the terrorist? if so, then i pose this question. why do we not all convert to islam, hand over all our money to pirates and kill every non-muslim? i mean these are at least real demands that have been made by real terrorists. and this is why i vote against democrats and liberal third parties(note, i DO vote for third parties, just not democratesque third parties) when will people wake up and realise that the “compassion” that they always talk about is not only just a ploy to attempt to gain power but its not even a ploy they are willing to honestly follow through with, it’s a lie, a deception. enough of my rant though.
Well said ionekoo.
Hell Yeah! Thats a win win situation right there!
Sorry, No, I wouldn’t. I value my own being over that of my country.
If I knew that they were definately a terrorist though, I’d trick them into thinking I was going to do it, then I’d have to kill them.
How would you be assured that upon committing the act that they would stop the attack?
And how would that stymie further attacks in the future? Eventually they’ll just get horny again.
Depends on the guy.
Andrew Sullivan would be excellent at a game of truth or dare.
in a heartbeat ! I really don’t need a good reason.
that might be the dumbest hypothetical question ever. the two are completely unrelated.
the osama bin laden one is at least slightly interesting. i say no, because he’s as deserving of God’s grace as any one of us.
I don’t think I would. It would be like selling out. Some things just aren’t for sale. Not here anyway.
By the way. That is a really stupid question.
After careful thought, I have to say “no.” My initial reason for saying no is my firm conviction that homosexual behavior is sinful. But it also occurs to me that, if I did something like that and the attack was prevented, then I would be disgusted by the memory of the act and constantly ask myself, “Was this really the only way to prevent the attack? Or was I just duped into doing something morally wrong and unnatural?”
This is a sick question!
No
after making my comments and then re-reading the posts, i am distraught over the number of people that simply jumped right into the pit. i am in terror for the intelligence of america. i wish i could stay here in seoul and not go back.
No way. What’s YOUR answer, Dan?
Depends on the terrorist attack.