February 22, 2008
-
Puppy Love
A man has been charged with having sex with a 4-year-old female rottweiler.
He broke-in to a garage and the owner walked out to her garage and caught him in the act. He is being charged with “criminal sodomy and aggravated burglary.” The burglary charge is because he broke into the home.
I want to focus on the “criminal sodomy” charge. The rottweiler was not injured. A spokeswoman from the Humane Society said that it qualifies as animal cruelty. Here is the link: Link
When I posted this in my photoblog, Trunthepaige sarcastically mentioned:
“And in my never ending effort to disgust people. The reason a 100lbs of dog, with very strong jaws and sharp teeth, did not bite, is because she was in season. The dog was willing.
So who are we in impose are own personal morality on others? Who are we to say that man dog ‘love’ is wrong?”I think Paige has a point. If the dog didn’t want to have sex, she could have resisted.
Is it animal cruelty to have sex with a dog?
Comments (166)
Dogs can’t give express verbal consent, and even if they could, they probably don’t have the mental capacity to make an informed decision.
Ergo, you don’t fuck them.
Umm, kinda…
duhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.
that’s all i’m saying. should be very obvious.
It’s not rape if the dog didn’t say no!
people…. just… shock me.
wow
That guy should be sent to jail simply for being an idiot.
@DrugInducedDuck - hahaha i was thinking the same thing…
ew?
regardless… we know it’s socially deviant.
I’d say we weren’t created to have sex with dogs, no matter how much someone would want to have that…
It’s a sexual disorder.
@hello_insanity -
That is elitist, so now sex is only for those with an acceptable IQ.
yes… yes it is…
i agree with hello_insanity.
Okay, here goes. o__o;
The dog is intelligent and the dog is willing. So are some 13-year-olds. If the guy had broken into a house and had sex with a slutty 13-year-old, he would get arrested, too. For pretty much the same concept.
The dog did not have the ability to decline nor the mental capabilities to fully grasp the situation. Abuse.
Hock the guy behind bars. =___=; Obviously, there’s a screw loose somewhere.
Haha, Dan. Yes, it is definitely animal cruelty. God only knows where else that jerk thinks it’s okay to stick it. I wish he’d go to jail and drop his soap, but that would be a reward for him!
Kathi
I don’t know about animal cruelty. I think it’s morally disgusting, but legally, I don’t know that he should have been charged with sodomy.
This reminds me of the Michael Vick thing as far as dogs’ rights goes. I think if it was his dog, then there should be no legal ramifications for it. Clearly, that wasn’t the case, and as it is, I think his crime is more against the owner than the animal: using her property without permission, the “aggravated burglary” part of the accusation. But criminal sodomy? Absolutely not. Pet dogs are, by definition, property. One owns them, so the same laws, the same legalities that apply to your car or a vase in your house should apply to them.
maybe not for the dog, but with the mental image, some of us are scarred for life. It is just ….. not……RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! UGH!
Dude, rottweilers scare the shit out of me, and I love dogs. This guy had guts to even attempt to fuck it. I think he should get an award for being so insane.
eww… what’s wrong with him? Yuck yuck yuck.
ewww this is nasty! It’s like the world keeps getting worse every day!
@trunthepaige -
I didn’t say anything about IQ. For example, some 7 year old kids have higher IQs than both of us combined, but I don’t think they’re capable of consenting to sex.
the dog was in season, she probably had some fun too. really it’s just something up there, and it’s pleasurable. think from the dog’s perspective, like you said, she didn’t fight back, so obviously she wanted it. so i don’t think it’s animal cruelty.
Dogs don’t have the capacity to consent to sexual relations, so yes, it is animal cruelty. And it’s just plain disgusting.
um.. GROSS!
breaking and entering
…and entering
Oh this is so twisted …
dogs can’t express themselves verbally…and it was probably animal instinct
as animals with a slightly above average intelligence of the natural world, it should be up to us to do what’s right. which means not screwing a dog.
Thats just freaking SICK.
@hello_insanity -
The dog was 28 in “dog years”. What is the age of consent for a dog?
@EgoTransplant -
I agree, that’s so wrong ><
I turned a rottweiler away from it’s owner once. She listened to me and not him.
Do you know how?
I had sex with her.
You think I’m kidding.
@another_rebel_without_a_cause -
Yhat was a guilty laugh you caused me to experience
@trunthepaige - Ready, willing and able babe!
I should have made a video. I would be famous now.
OK I’m just going to say I LOVE the title of this post. Too funny. LOL
Yes, this is animal cruelty, sick, immoral, and etc.
So… wrong.
>_<
wtf.
Why does anyone really think they need to make a up a reason? It is sick, and it is immoral . . . enough said.
@trunthepaige -
Dogs =/= human. They can’t give consent. “She didn’t resist” is not a good defence for why you had sex with something.
you can’t just go around saying, oh the dog didnt resist so its ok. a dude with a little dog like a chihuahua does NOT sound like a good situation for the dog, in season or not….
it’s immoral and wrong. and someone else’s dog? even stepping aside of the immorality of messing with dogs- you don’t go around screwing other people’s property- inanimate or living.
@hello_insanity -
You have never seen a dog in season have you? They give consent, as a matter of fact they can be rather aggressive about what they want. And there is no misunderstanding it.
When talking about 100lbs of muscle, equipped with very sharp teeth “She didn’t resist” is very meaningfully
@trunthepaige -
That’s fucking ridiculous and you KNOW it. I get that you’re trying to be sarcastic here, but what you’re playing at is totally off base. Trying to apply the human morals of “as long as there is express consent sex is okay” to NONhuman relations to prove some kind of point is just crazy. We both know quite well that dogs can’t give consent and it’s therefore wrong to have sex with animals.
@hello_insanity -
Yes this is stupid, because it is simply immoral we both agree with that but you insist on making up a reason for it. But dogs can give consent. When talking about a Rottweiler, you damn well better get that consent frist, because they are far from helpless.
Love and sex are not interchangeable terms.
Men can have sex with animals all they want – but only their own animals. Animals are property, and they cannot sign legal consent, etc… This man does NOT have the right to mess with someone else’s property.
@trunthepaige -
I’m not making up a reason, I honestly don’t think that just because it doesn’t attack you qualifies as consent. We’ll just have to agree to disagree on that.
This guy should be arrested not only for breaking into someone else’s property, but for abusing such an innocent creature.
This guy has mental issues and should be placed in a mental institution. G-d created Eve for Adam, for a frigging damn reason. If having sexual intercourse with animals was normal, G-d wouldn’t have created her.
Also, this is why we have a well known disease called HIV. Lets say a big thanks to the guy who decided to screw a monkey!!
@hello_insanity -
I hope you are not taking me to seriously on this one. I only mean about half of of what I am writing
@trunthepaige - Sexual arousal is NOT the same thing as consent!
Animals are designed to act on their sexual urges without check. What distinguishes humans – and permits the very concept of consent – is our ability to choose long-term goals over short-term rewards (or rather, that is one aspect of the ability that truly separates us – rationality).
Animals can’t consent to anything, because they do not have a thinking mind. They are emotional creatures, and act on instinct only. Instinct is programmed, not chosen.
i am speechless.
@trunthepaige - “Why does anyone really think they need to make a up a reason? It is sick, and it is immoral . . . enough said.”
If you’re going to say that something is sick and immoral, you must have a reason. If you don’t have a reason for your moral code, then it’s simply random, or based on gut instinct. Such a system could justify murder, enslavement, or rape.
@Riva465 -
“screw a monkey”
no it was from hunting monkeys for food and being bitten by a bleeding monkey. At least that is the most likely scenario.
@trunthepaige -
It’s honestly not what you’re saying that’s bothering me, because I know you don’t believe it. It’s just that when people go off saying things like that, they’re usually a toe away from springing out with something crazy about how homosexuality is just like bestiality. I probably came off angrier than I meant to from having heard that argument before and jumping the gun on expecting it again.
@la_faerie_joyeuse -
I like your system, it’s all good as long as you own the dog.
I will put my basis of morality up against your situational version any day.
@hello_insanity -
Homosexual was the last thing on my mind. I was just making the point that situational morality is a very slippery slope
Ok, here is the deal. It isn’t about the dog. It was the act itself. Relativism is a joke. There is no “imposing morals onto others” there is a right and there is a wrong. Period. We as a nation need to uphold these standards. Honestly, do you want to live in a nation where this isn’t wrong? Where all kinds of sexual deviance is no ones business but the one acting it out? You choose to ignore the fact that it was in someone elses garage and choose to focus on the act instead, but the whole thing lies in the fact that this complete PERVERT broke into someone elses home. It was an act of violence and twisted lust. I honestly cannot even believe this is a question. Everyone knows this is sick. Even the other animal molesters know they have a problem.
I don’t think that was the case. I’m almost positive it was because of sexual intercourse!!
Whatever it was, its a cruel and a disgusting act and this guy obviously has no morals what so ever!
people like that shouldn’t be walking on the face of this planet.
@trunthepaige - It’s not situational. Pets are property, and this was a violation of property rights. It’s not about the sexual act itself – the sex is crude but should be legal.
It would really depend on the comfort level of the animal. Whether the coupling results in momentary pain or permanent damage (more physically, but emotional impact is also important).
@trunthepaige -
Hmm, I’ve never heard of situational morality before, so I can’t really speak to that.
@thelaughterdies - Do you want to live in a nation without oral sex? For centuries (and even in the oh-so-precious bible), it was condemned as sexual deviance. It still is by the laws of many states, including my own.
You may hold certain moral values, and you may wish your friends to aspire to the same, but the only thing you should care about random strangers doing is if they violate someone’s life, liberty, or property. If I want to have sex with a woman (which many consider to be immoral), then why is that wrong? If I want to have sex with a black man (which many still consider immoral), then why is that wrong? If I want to have sex with my own pet, then still, why is that wrong? You may eschew such practices, not least for the psychological perversion required to perform at least the last, but if it doesn’t violate anyone else’s rights, who are you to determine what right and wrong are? Furthermore, who are you to violate someone else’s rights to enforce this victimless morality?
@la_faerie_joyeuse -
“and even in the oh-so-precious bible”
Really were?
I can show you a place in the Song of Solomon were Cunnilingus is described in a very poetic and positive light.
Good night
So let me guess, are they going to San Francisco to get married or is the dog pregnant and the left is throwing a fit because they are going to abort the puppies?
What’s the matter with people?!?!? There are some sick fockers out there. It’s a scary world we live in.
@la_faerie_joyeuse - It’s not situational. Pets are property, and this was a violation of property rights. It’s not about the sexual act itself – the sex is crude but should be legal.
Ha. I’m in agreement. We also ought to factor in the well-being of the animal.
I say if you’re an adult, you shouldn’t be able to have sex with a dog under 18 years of age.
@la_faerie_joyeuse - Animals can’t consent to anything, because they do not have a thinking mind. They are emotional creatures, and act on instinct only. Instinct is programmed, not chosen.
I wouldn’t be so quick to come to that conclusion. Ideas and studies in animal psychology may be sufficienty developed to conclude whether canines and other house pets act on instinct alone.
But for the intents and purposes of this entry, I think your assumption is a safe one. And again, we’re in agreement here.
@Amandasbiggestfan - Adjusted for dog years, right?
@huginn - Why does the well-being of the animal matter?
You don’t fuck dogs.
They aren’t able to give consent.
Period.
I’ve been told that dogs like it ruff…
@la_faerie_joyeuse - Why does the well-being of the animal matter?
While the bar is set differently for non-huamns, there is such thing as animal crulety. We do agree that actions like skinning a live cat should be both immoral and illegal.
If the animal-sex act seriously harms the health and well-being of the animal, then the sex-act should be illegal.
i think it is animal cruelty–an animal cannot verbally consent. regardless it is immoral.
@trunthepaige - There is the passage in Gen 38:8-9, which describes God’s wrath at a man who wasted his semen. Then there is the famous Sodom for which sodomy is named – oral sex is associated with homosexuality and other “perversions” and “rebellions against god”.
@huginn - I don’t think that skinning a live cat should be illegal.
@la_faerie_joyeuse - I don’t think that skinning a live cat should be illegal.
Okay, I’m not sure either to find you scary or consider your stance admirable. Maybe both.
What is wrong with people!!! I mean come on this is just so wrong!
I guess it depends on what some people define “consent” as.
Verbally, no, the dog didn’t give consent. It’s very well known that they can’t. Not only do they most likely not have the vocal chords to do so, but they don’t know the English language or how to use it with which to give consent.
But physically, it didn’t resist, so could that be the same as consenting. Because you figure that they won’t do what they don’t want to – if they don’t want to go outside, the only way to get them out is to toss them out yourself, if they don’t want to bathe then you have to leash them to something and hold them down while they flail around.
I wonder, though, if people consider humans as animals “with higher intelligence,” and sometimes other animals inter-breed, then what’s the difference between a human and a dog having sex, than a horse and a mule having sex?
I’m pretty sure people are going to freak out but really, I don’t think it’s cruel unless the animal was hurt. I think it’s wrong, certainly, and that it’s disgusting, and possibly even immoral - and that if he was going to have sex with a dog, it shouldn’t have been someone else’s. Just because you disapprove of something doesn’t mean it’s necessarily cruel – it just means that it’s wrong.
Haha, this topic would come up after the conversation me and trunthepaige had on one of your other topics.
@trunthepaige - “You have never seen a dog in season have you? They give consent, as a
matter of fact they can be rather aggressive about what they want. And
there is no misunderstanding it.”
You don’t seem to understand “consent” is a political term, thus with a political definition. A horny 13 year old kid could want to have sex with an adult, but that still does not qualify as consent in the political definition. For someone to be able to give consent in the United States they have to be over 18 years old (some exceptions exist) and a human. The dog is neither.
I believe animals should be granted some minimum rights (basically not to be abused), and this would fall under that violation. This is speaking in the political sense though. In the moral sense is it really being cruel to an animal to have sex with an animal if the animal enjoys it? That’s something I haven’t put too much thought into and really don’t plan to in the near future.
I understand and respect the position la_faerie_joyeuse takes, that animals are merely property and thus can be basically be treated in any way by the owner, that would be the truer classic liberal position. I just can’t abandon animals to zero rights. Even if they are not self-aware, they still exhibit emotions and have a basic level of intelligence.
ew
woooooooooooooow.
and to think, i expected some cute little post about first crushes…
If the dog gave consent then it’s all legal.
well, besides the fact that it’s, in effect, rape(like raping someone who’s mentally retarded but ‘willing’), it’s wrong…I believe there’s something in the Bible about bestiality, but don’t hold me to it…
<8
@trunthepaige - Paige, are you serious?
We have consent for a reason, don’t be a dumbass.
@another_rebel_without_a_cause - haha hahahahahaha. oh that was funny. twisted, but funny. good job. =p
Doggy style with a whole new meaning.
Thats just plain wrong!
I’m agreeing with those who mentioned consent. The big deal these days, when discussing gay marriage and incest and child porn and all those other sex immoralities, is whether or not both are able to legally give consent. People think that if we legalize gay marriage then we’ll be going down a slippery slope, but I don’t see how this can possibly be when it’s clear that sexuality is only a crime when there isn’t legal consent.
-David
Absolutely. That’s just sick.
hey,Dude!
There are women who have sex with male dogs. Those dogs willingly penetrate them. So… I guess I can’t make the distinction here. If, in fact, the female dog was not injured, and did not try to resist in any way, I don’t think he should be charged with any wrong doing (except burglary of course.)
IT was not his dog though. Otherwise, gross it may be, I cannot see a need to impose a legal punishment for it, as yeah a rottweiler could probably tear you up if it wanted.
The burglary end of it warrants action, but otherwise is a waste of time and resources to the legal system, so far as I care.
You can put a dog in a crate, or on a leash, even use a shock collar, perform surgery, sterilize, and euthanize, without consent.
Curious, that for sex, apparently the lack of consent is an issue.
Not that I advocate sex with a dog, but stepping back and just looking at it from other perspectives.
This is so disturbing…….
@hello_insanity - You’ve never heard of situational morality, but people engage in it all the time. When there is not some absolute standard outside onesself, it is situational. People decide each situation based on what you feel at that time. Their feelings could change, therefore, it is situational rather than absolute.
@JJ_Ames - You brought a smile to my face in the morning. Thanks.
Once Barack gets in the White House, I HOPE this kind of stuff stops happeing. I believe in Barack, because I want to Hope in Hope
You would have to be one sick bastard to do that…….it would not phase me if this guy also goes to court and states he has done it with other animals such as horses, cows…and OK chickens……he’s beyond mental
a dog? that’s sick. horses are much sexier.
Slow news day, Dan?
Disgusting. I agree with those who said it’s deviant and animal cruelty.
wow…………………………….
I…. don’t even know were to start with this
That dog was 4-years old. Pedophile.
I use human standards with human crimes!
uh, yeah.
Whether or not it is animal cruelty is moot. It’s disgusting.
@Still_groovy -
Please don’t equate beastiality with homosexuality, that’s just ignorant.
@Still_groovy -
Dropping the soap is useless for this guy. He’d probably like whatever resulted…
Yuck!! That guy has problems…
shocking mental image… i am speechless.
That depends. Did he take the dog out to dinner afterwards?
omg that is just wrong. poor doggie dunno what is happening. that is freaken sick. maybe if it was his own dog but he did it to someone else’s dog. and when the dog humps ur leg does it mean that he is treating you with human abuse?
I would have to say that even if it wasn’t cruelty to be having sex with a dog (or a monkey or llama or any other animal for that matter), its still disgusting. I can’t imagine anyone who is deviant enough to actually consider it, let alone go through with it.
having sex with any animal is gross.dogs are like children, they can’t protest being raped, and that is what this man did. also, this had to be a premediated crime.he had to be planning this because he knew where to find the female dog. this man is a sick person and should be treated the way a criminal that had abused an animal and raped a child would be.
Here’s the Kansas Animal Cruelty Statute. It looks like they are going to have a difficult time proving the case if the evidence shows that the dog was unharmed.
K.S.A. § 21-4310 (2006)21-4310. Cruelty to animals.
(a) Cruelty to animals is:
(1) Intentionally and maliciously killing, injuring, maiming, torturing, burning or mutilating any animal;
(2) intentionally abandoning or leaving any animal in any place without making provisions for its proper care;
(3) having physical custody of any animal and intentionally failing to
provide such food, potable water, protection from the elements,
opportunity for exercise and other care as is needed for the health or
well-being of such kind of animal;
(4) intentionally using a wire, pole, stick, rope or any other object
to cause an equine to lose its balance or fall, for the purpose of
sport or entertainment; or
(5) intentionally causing any physical injury other than the acts described in subsection (a)(1).
(b) The provisions of this section shall not apply to:
(1) Normal or accepted veterinary practices;
(2) bona fide experiments carried on by commonly recognized research facilities;
(3) killing, attempting to kill, trapping, catching or taking of any
animal in accordance with the provisions of chapter 32 or chapter 47 of
the Kansas Statutes Annotated;
(4) rodeo practices accepted by the rodeo cowboys’ association;
(5) the humane killing of an animal which is diseased or disabled
beyond recovery for any useful purpose, or the humane killing of
animals for population control, by the owner thereof or the agent of
such owner residing outside of a city or the owner thereof within a
city if no animal shelter, pound or licensed veterinarian is within the
city, or by a licensed veterinarian at the request of the owner
thereof, or by any officer or agent of an incorporated humane society,
the operator of an animal shelter or pound, a local or state health
officer or a licensed veterinarian three business days following the
receipt of any such animal at such society, shelter or pound;
(6) with respect to farm animals, normal or accepted practices of
animal husbandry, including the normal and accepted practices for the
slaughter of such animals for food or by-products and the careful or
thrifty management of one’s herd or animals, including animal care
practices common in the industry or region;
(7) the killing of any animal by any person at any time which may be
found outside of the owned or rented property of the owner or custodian
of such animal and which is found injuring or posing a threat to any
person, farm animal or property;
(8) an
animal control officer trained by a licensed veterinarian in the use of
a tranquilizer gun, using such gun with the appropriate dosage for the
size of the animal, when such animal is vicious or could not be
captured after reasonable attempts using other methods;
(9) laying an equine down for medical or identification purposes;
(10) normal or accepted practices of pest control, as defined in subsection (x) of K.S.A. 2-2438a, and amendments thereto; or
(11) accepted practices of animal husbandry pursuant to regulations
promulgated by the United States department of agriculture for domestic
pet animals under the animal welfare act, public law 89-544, as amended
and in effect on July 1, 2006.
(c) As used in this section:
(1) ”Equine” means a horse, pony, mule, jenny, donkey or hinny.
(2) ”Maliciously” means a state of mind characterized by actual
evil-mindedness or specific intent to do a harmful act without a
reasonable justification or excuse.
(d) (1) Cruelty to animals
as described in subsection (a)(1) is a nonperson felony. Upon
conviction of this subsection, a person shall be sentenced to not less
than 30 days or more than one year’s imprisonment and be fined not less
than $ 500 nor more than $ 5,000. During the mandatory 30 days
imprisonment, such offender shall have a psychological evaluation
prepared for the court to assist the court in determining conditions of
probation. Such conditions shall include, but not be limited to, the
completion of an anger management program.
(2) The first conviction of cruelty to animals
as described in subsection (a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(4) and (a)(5) is a class
A nonperson misdemeanor. The second or subsequent conviction of cruelty to animals
as described in subsection (a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(4) and (a)(5) is a
non-person felony. Upon such conviction, a person shall be sentenced to
not less than five days or more than one year’s imprisonment.
(e) For purposes of this section, “animal” shall have the meaning ascribed to it in K.S.A. 21-4313, and amendments thereto.
animal cruelty – no. stupidity – yes.
I dunno. Sometimes I think the idea that bestiality is “animal cruelty” is something we’ve come up with to explain why it should disgust us so much and to justify why it’s wrong without using the words “sexual deviancy”. After all, that might be admitting that there’s something to traditional morals, and we’re far too “sophisticated” for that.
it’s disgusting!
It is just wrong and nasty and ….. eh…. I shouldn’t have read this early in the morning…
O_o
Oh my.
<33
C’mon Dan…… NEW Post. This is just sick….
People will justify any disgusting act
If hes going to break into someones property and assault a family pet whats next, he belongs in jail!
Yes, it is animal cruelty.
@trunthepaige - You made a great point.
ugh.. yes.
I had both a Rott and a Pit Bull…the pit bull, while trying to be breed, kept whipping around and biting the male…even my Rott when confronted by someone she didn’t want to even PET her would growl and snap….perhaps its just wrong cause wasn’t HIS dog…would it have been better if HE owned the dog and his neighbor saw him in his own garage?
I mean does he walk around scoping out other people’s dogs?? Is he trolling kennels and dog walk paths? Milling around the Petco and Pet Smart looking for love?
Just get the man some help….jail might not be the best place for him…cause once you’ve made the conscious choice to start screwing animals that could kill you, you clearly need psychiatric care…
Umm… idk.
That is disgusting. That man seriously needs some psychiatric help.
@skythrock - it’s a fine line. a.) That IS animal cruelty. Animals also return to people who abuse them, because they don’t know any different. And animals may be legal property, but that does NOT give people the right to abuse them. They’re living beings.
The dog was only 4–so he was having sex with a minor.
@Dontgimmedathup -
Ah, I see. Thanks for explaining it.
It’s not cruelty, it’s just weird.
it’s human cruelty to do something like that
UCk
What is disturbing is we live in a day and age that beastiality (sp) is becoming news.
no. thats just weird…and really really desperate…>.>
That pup is adorable!!! I want one!!
@Nikolais_apprentice -
Sure it gives them the right. That’s the definition of legal property. I’m not saying that I like it or that I think it’s cool (in fact, I think it’s repulsive), but I think that the law has no place telling a person what they can or cannot do with their property.
Yes. For pete’s sake, humans are not supposed to have sex with animals.
@Still_groovy - God only knows where else that jerk thinks it’s okay to stick it…
you hit the nail on the head!
My question is why a dog? But i dont want to impose my sense of morals on another. Sure it sounds nasty but if the dog was not injured or forced i dont see why it should be considered a crime.
Wow. How low can you go? Corgi??
i don’t think it’s animal cruelty, but it’s still disgusting.
@trunthepaige -
Hence the illegality of screwing children and people with mental retardation
I heard stories of women who’ve been raped by huge 400lb baboons in Malaysia. Should the women be charged with rape? Sure.
I meant orangutans not baboons, sorry.
We can always throw the age rule at him..dog was technically a minor
Please, the dog was in her 20′s in human years.
OMG BEASTIALITY!!!!!
oh god this painted a WRONG image in me head 
I don’t think you have enough information to establish that the dog was willing. 100 lbs is not much and puppies are naive. At best, it’s statutory dog rape which most would agree is still animal cruelty.
in my opinion, morality depends on the state of mind.
…wishfeather…
This is sick!!!! Very wrong in many ways. How would the dog know what have done to her is injustice if she confused of what just happen? Think of the dog is like a child. If this happen to a four year old girl, would you say it’s child molest? Or you would say she enjoy it because she can resist him. Anything that have to do with violating one’s personal right is a crime including pets. They have rights too.
yeah…I think so…
ewww well… thats one way of looking at it
No capacity for consent means no sex. Sex should stay among species, it’s not only against the creationist school of thought that humans being the stewardship of all else on earth. It also against an evolutionary school in the idea that species mating with those below can never form new and diverse species. The mating is fruitless therefore it shouldn’t be.
Either way you look at it, it shouldn’t occur.
Ewwww. I like what Leno said tho.”Michael Vic has no idea what community service means”
since the dog wasn’t 18, it’s statutory rape.
lol!
Isn’t this the way some STDs were introduced to the human race?
Relations with sheep?
I totally agree with skythrock
Good grief. Sick.
the dog’s cute…i could totally see why he wanted to have sex with it……………………………………….
are you KIDDING me?!
yeah, not imposing our morals upon people is a good thing….but….seriously……having sex with a dog…….you can’t honestly expect me to not think that weird….that’s messed up…..
OH yes, having sex with dogs is totally NOT wrong in any way, it’s perfectly healthy…..
………….seriously………wtf…
It’s sick.
12-year-olds consent to sex with older men every day, but we don’t question how morally disgusting and wrong that is. Women who are drunk get raped every day, but we also don’t question how morally disgusting and wrong it is to take advantage of a woman simply because she’s intoxicated. How could anyone possibly say it’s okay to have sex with a dog simply because the dog didn’t bite or attack the person?!
@sk8erboi4ever926 -
“12-year-olds consent to sex with older men every day, but we don’t question how morally disgusting and wrong that is.”
Yes we do…..(if you are referring to in the U.S.). It is against the law and generally pedophilia is viewed as disgusting and unacceptable (just look at how inmates treat pedophiles- they are viewed as trash both in and outside prison).
“Women who are drunk get raped every day, but we also don’t question how
morally disgusting and wrong it is to take advantage of a woman simply
because she’s intoxicated.”
We have laws against date rape…..(and rapists usually are viewed as scum as well).
How have you been living in the United States with no clue about pedophilia or rape laws?
wait… so a man had sex with a dog… thats what happened???
@whataboutbahb - Sir… that is exactly what I’m saying. We don’t question it because it’s obvious. How did you not get that from the context?
@sk8erboi4ever926 -
My mistake. I thought you were implying that we simply do not question the examples provided (and, thus, I was very confused by you saying such things). Due to the number of people who comment on Dan’s blog about the downward spiral of U.S. morals on the whole, I simply took your comment to be along those lines (that people basically cannot recognize disgusting actions anymore because of how “sinful” we have become). My apologies.
@whataboutbahb - No problem.
yes its so wrong.
Duh.