February 25, 2010
-
Tweeting an Abortion
Angie Jackson is in the news for tweeting her abortion live.
The woman said “nothing is off-limits on Twitter, not even the details of her abortion.”
She took the abortion pill and then told everyone what she was thinking and feeling. She typed, “Cramps are getting a bit more persistent.” She went on to post “Definitely bleeding now.” Here is the link: Link
Do you think that no topic is off-limits for the Internet?
Comments (137)
Pretty much.
that shouldn’t be tweeted.
She obviously wanted to prove a point and I think it’s a stupid way to do that. It’s the same thing as people who are anti-abortion putting fetuses on poster board. There are easier and less vomit-inducing ways to show how you feel.
WTF She’s an idiot!
Apparently not.
Funny, I’m writing a research paper about this right now (the legal side of it). I’ll get back to you.
I guess it really depends WHERE you put something
For example, putting such a personal topic on tweeter, where the whole world can see it..not so smart, i thinkAbortion is definitely a sensitive topic to many peopleAnd many people would find it both offensive and disgusting that someone would post all the gory details for the world to seeOn the other hand, someone considering an abortion would want some clues as to what to expectSo lets say she puts this on a fan site or something insteadThen maybe her fans would be more forgiving
no. its impossible.
Only the guide to having a real life is off limits on the internets, mostly because no one using the internets has a real life.
Freedom of speech, though it obviously upset a lot of people…
Thats despicable wrong and disgusting. I am surprised she did that having no regard for the human life she just killed. Its like someone tweeting how they were murdering someone.
I would not want to know. T_T
she made the news, bravo
it’s her life. I don’t see the problem.
no, the internet needs to remain an open place for people to freely communicate their thoughts and feelings. Even if they are evil and terroristic. Censoring the internet will lead to a face mask being put over the human race. The reality would not be real. It is like sex in puritan times. Officially there was no such thing. Privately, it was everywhere and people were popping out huge families.
I have seen Sonic the Hedgehog porn. Nothing really gets to me anymore.
Wow. I think there is probably a much better way to say what she wanted to say. It just seems inappropriate to me.
That seems to be the reality, but some things should be kept private. And some people will learn that the hard way.
@AibellFaeire - Wait… What?!
Internet has no limits.
it simply shows what a despicable person she is, to have such little regard for life(and for herself).
and no, no topic is off limits for the internet, now.
hahahaahhahahaha unborn baby killing and whoredom all in one tweet. Classic.
@AibellFaeire - did it have the pink hedgehog in it too
wow wtf
I agree with that, yes. No topic is truly off-limits online, just as no topic is off-limits in the world of traditional publishing.
If someone could write the novel Lolita, then we can tweet anything we like.
The lengths people go to for attention these days is pretty unbelievable…at least in reguard to 40 years ago…heck even 20 years ago. We are in the age of idiocy right now I think.
I think it’s a good thing she did. She obviously had good reasons, she can’t have this child anyway, so yes she made the right choice. As for the internet, tweeting her abortion, I don’t think it’s so bad. Women that go through it don’t know what to expect a lot of the time, and now they will. They can see what somebody else felt like, went through, and what it did to their body. I think her reasons for putting it on twitter and the fact that people can learn from it makes it ok.
Sure she offended some people, but she put some girls at ease that may be going through it and don’t understand as well as they should. Whether you agree with abortion or not, knowledge is power.
If you don’t like how the internet has no boundaries, then you really need to come to terms with reality or go back to your cave and return to licking the lichen off the walls.
Hope she goes to hell. The end.
big deal.
People have no shame and just because it’s the internet doesn’t mean you can just refrain from having some self-respect.
@ShimmerBodyCream - That’s who he was doing. It was really something I did not want to see.
I didn’t think there was such a thing as an “abortion pill”. Does it make you spit out the fetus or something?
And no, nothing is off limits on the internet. I should know, I’ve seen plenty.
D:
@ccarothers - Fact. It was terrifying.
she can write what she wants but it just confirms what a shithead she is. She’ll reap the social consequences of her actions.
That is grotesque and she is obviously quite an unhealthy individual. I would not want such an individual anywhere near me or my family.
I’m sorry, but that just seems wrong…
i think abortions and bowel movements should be taboo !
Privates things shouldn’t be facebooked or tweeted. I don’t get why people put such personal things online.
@PervyPenguin - It can be taken up to 9 weeks in the pregnancy. The pill blocks progesterone causing the uterus lining to break down. Then you take a second pill that causes you to bleed heavily and it washes out. Yuck.
WTF?
Good lord lets just admit that nothing is
Obviously none of you read the entire article before you passed your judgments. She already had one son who was disabled and her first pregnancy nearly killed her. Her doctors advised her that it wouldn’t be safe to have another one… so either she could have gotten an abortion or had another child that might have a disability with the possibility of death. Although, I do think it’s a bit much to share that on twitter.. I understand why she did. The internet has no limits, obviously. I’ve seen a video of a person getting their head cut off soo.. yeah, not much bothers me.
@bridgetlee1003 - People who wish that on others are probably going to be joining them in Hell if there is one.
@rainbowbrite2200 - Amen to that.
@ShimmerBodyCream - if i could like this shit, i would.
WTF?
I, personally, do not think that I could have an abortion, pill or otherwise. I am a mother and my pregnancies were both high risk. I survived and I have a healthy 6 and 9 year old and I also have a special needs son whom I adopted. However, I do think that abortions should be legal in certain circumstances such as rape, incest or the mother’s life being at risk. I can’t pass judgment on anyone who has had an abortion because only they know their circumstances, but, the only people I personally know who have had an abortion, were all adult, educated females, capable of caring for a child or giving it up for adoption, who had an abortion as a form of birth control because they forgot a condom. They all also regretted it. One in particular has been rendered unable to have children as a result of her abortions. These are the situations I have known about.
It’s just really hard for me to comprehend the act because pregnancy is, in my mind, the most intimate experience a woman has with her body, wanted or not , it seems like it would be a very difficult thing to go about doing. Our society seems to accept that nothing is off limits to be posted online. Certainly the woman has freedom of speech and freedom to do what she wants with her body but to put this out there in this way just seems beyond absurd to me.
What’s the problem? She’s only letting other women know what they can expect. Her experience will help others make a more informed choice when it comes to deciding between the pill or surgical method.
There are some thing sacred to some and apparently not to others. It’s a tough call to make.
But I do believe there are some things off-limits to the internet.
@Nellie0x - Agreed. I think in this case, even from a pro-life perspective abortion was justified. I could never tell another woman to risk her life like that.
It her choice but I couldn’t. There is just something off about tweeting it–like making it seem so–I dunno but it is her choice.
I’ll be totally honest here. This one is hard for me to read. I had a friend once who had made some poor choices and got pregnant. Wanting to help, I had told her that I would be willing to adopt the child if she would carry it to term and she had agreed but one night she called me, having panicked and gone to get an abortion. She called me because she was effectively going into labor and giving birth to the dead child. There are some things I’ve been through that will forever haunt me. One of those things was being the friend she called that night and hearing her appologizing to the child for what she’d done and basically having to coach her through the process while trying to be there for my friend while having to deal with the loss myself. That is definitely one of the hardest things I’ve ever had to do and it certainly plays it’s part in my stance on the abortion issue.
Nothing is off limits.
ehh… freedom of speech?
I suppose more in line with the question though, I would add that there are some things that should be off limits online (child pornography, human trafficing (AKA the slave trade), and the hiring of an assasin just to give a few examples. Fot the most part, there should be freedom to say and do most things but there are a few things that just should not be period. As for how far to go in order to enforce such things, well, that is another discussion entirely.
I don’t feel right judging her choice to post her abortion online. Who knows what she is going through, maybe people on twitter are her only support. Maybe she feels guilty and wants people to condemn her as a way to punish herself. I don’t even want to attempt to guess what her reasons are, but she is a grown adult capable of making the choice of what to post online. You might not agree with abortion or posting about it, but it is her right to express herself.
I find this an amusing question from a man who persists on pushing the boundaries of what is “acceptable” subject matter. Is anything off limits online? I don’t think so.
Whether or not someone chooses to post something that others deem inappropriate or crass or unpleasant is entirely up to them and the confines of various terms and conditions of the host site they use.
Hilarious.
well, dan…i can’t think of any you haven’t covered.
Some things I’d just rather not know.
@nephyo - Agreed. I also second LauraG0929‘s comment. I think people put *far* too much of their personal lives on the internet, but I guess here that was the point. Everyone commenting about how sick & wrong it is – that’s just a knee-jerk reaction – I get that abortion is a very sensitive topic, and everyone seems to have an opinion on it – that’s fine. But none of us can dictate whether her decisions are sick, wrong, etc. b/c that’s just an opinion. Obviously for her, that may not have been the case…
sounds like she needs a friend to talk to irl if she’s talking to twitter about something as big as this..
*sigh* anti-choicers drive me batty.
That’s just disgusting.
It depends on the subject.
As far as her tweeting about what went on after she took the abortion pill, while it was her choice that’s such a sensitive & private topic that she shouldn’t have tweted it.
Somehow that seems like it would cross the line. I guess it’s her Twitter… she can do whatever the heck she wants. But I think it’s just kind of unclassy.
It’s her Twitter and it’s not up to us or anyone else to tell her what she can or cannot tweet. I wanna go look for this now. Twitter is a place I use to tell what I’m thinking and feeling and going through…and if that was at the forefront of her mind, then that’s what it was.
I’m willing to bet she lost a lot of followers…but maybe she uses twitter like a diary…and so when she looks back on it she sees exactly what she went through and thinks twice before having unprotected sex. Unlikely, but possible.
I honestly just think it’s sad. Some people will go so far for attention on the internet. At least she got what she wanted? I don’t know. Personally, i’ve seen worse put on the internet, but this is the first time i’ve seen it on someones personal page. I feel bad for her.
@polishswede - Oh ouch…
But probably less painful than actual child birth..
We should have freedom of speech to say whatever we want; however, when someone does something stupid or immoral, it is the duty of everyone who encounters it to at least state it as such.
On this particular subject, I think that her Twitter account should be revoked just because Twitter is a website that a lot of people use, including some young, impressionable teens. Their parents may not be aware that this is what they might encounter on that site. If it was 4Chan, I would say “go for it! Make a fool out of the travesty that you are!”
No topic is off limits and it’s very obvious. Seeing talk, though, I believe we don’t need any more people like her so getting an abortion was a good move on her part. I wouldn’t want her to reproduce any more. she should really get her tubes tied. Idiot…
@Nellie0x - I agree.
@SKANLYN - That’s what I kinda thought she was doing… but I haven’t seen it, so – Wait, I actually just paused to watch it. She says at the beginning she’s going to be non-descriptive, and she seems to want people to not feel scared if they’re going to go through it. Yeah, this video is not horrible at all… not the way it sounds to many. As for it being on Twitter, well, I’ve seen a video of a guy cutting his own penis in half (my ex was playing a joke… not funny) and that is just… yeah.
If people can post vidoes of people being killed so can this trashy lowlife. I believe she will be haunted in her future for her actions.
Is this for real?
Nope. And no one was really forced to read her tweets. If people have the freedom to leave death threats, and despicable messages to her, then she has the same right. I think people who gave her the death threats are showing how hypocritical they are. THey could at least be consistent. Others who are calling her an awful person are just ignorant because they really don’t know this girl or why she’s doing this. Anyone can think she’s making a poor decision, but everyone is acting stupid in this case. People judging her for this/calling her names/leaving death threats, does not make them more stand up people. I’d say they are on the same level they think she is on.
@seeker_nyc - What a bitch, deciding that she wants to live long enough to see her son grow up.
@Lady_Kelacy - Me either. How dare she choose to live! Despicable! She should have died during pregnancy and left her disabled first child motherless instead.
You two are infinitely more horrid than this woman.
I don’t think any topic is off limits. I may not agree with how she shared her abortion experience, but everyone has a right to express themselves.
Maybe I’ve become desensitized or my morals have reached an all-time low. When it comes to human behavior, nothing surprises me anymore.
With that said, who’s to decide what’s right or wrong for the internet and where would such censure end?
Boo hoo, she is having an abortion, she is evil, how dare she, she’s going to hell… like @MyJudas - said, HOW DARE SHE CHOOSE TO LIVE AND TAKE CARE OF HER SON!!! Idiots.
Seriously? That’s your response? Guess what, she’s an atheist so in your obviously bigoted eyes she’s already evil and going to hell. Deal with it.
No, there is no problem with this being online. As a matter of fact, I think it’s great. She is giving a factual account of what she is going through. Maybe it will prepare other people for what will happen.
@Legendairy - ” would add that there are some things that
should be off limits online (child pornography, human trafficing (AKA
the slave trade), and the hiring of an assasin just to give a few
examples”
Those things are all already illegal, online and offline.
@Nellie0x - I read the entire article. I meant what I said, and if I go to hell, so be it. If the internet has no limits, I think I had a right to say what I wanted. That’s just my opinion though.
Maybe it’s a good thing.
People who had no clue what an abortion was like could learn something. Maybe they wouldn’t want an abortion after they knew the details.
@MyJudas - no, you asshole, I’m not criticizing the abortion itself. I’m criticizing the fact that she’s tweeting it. She’s not Harriet Beecher Stowe or anything.
Freedom of speech. Meaning she can say whatever she wants and you’re gonna have to like it. Cause you get the same freedoms.
@bosefius - that’s what I took from it as well.
@seeker_nyc - And why shouldn’t she tweet it? People blog and tweet about giving birth all the time. (And giving birth is way grosser than having a planned miscarriage.)
@MyJudas - when you’re older and more mature, you’ll understand. Or if you’re old and don’t realize it already, then you’re doomed. You’re comparing an abortion to a birth? Seriously?
@seeker_nyc - The anti-choice folks try to keep everyone as in the dark as possible about abortion. Most people have *no idea* what an abortion entails. I congratulate this woman for being brave enough to inform others about her experiences, regardless of the self-righteous pricks who are more concerned with making sure women are punished for sex than making sure the children already living get taken care of.
And, yeah, I compared abortion to birth. Both involve removing a fetus from a womb, just at different stages of development. Woopdeefrakkingdoo.
it’s truely sad how misuse of drugs and alcohol can fry the brain….I’m not against either, if done responcibly, but this is truely a case where either one, the other or both were misused
wow…the ppl cmmntng on the link appear to be uneducated for the most part
-she wasn’t promoting unprotected sex, pregnancy, & stds in teens nor was she condoning it—she HAD protected sex. she has an iud so obvi. she didn’t wanna get pregnant so she took the right steps in preventing a pregnancy but shit happens & she dealt w/it the best way she could. even if she just didn’t WANNA have a bby she has the right to an abortion up to a certain stage in pregnancy which she obvi. didn’t yet reach, regardless of wht YOU pro-lifers out there have to say abt it-tht’s reality so deal w/it. also, her dr. tld her NOT to have another kid…she was just following wht her dr. tld her to do! how is tht wrong? i don’t see why anyone would wanna risk their lives for an undeveloped clump of cells inside of them. it is NOT yet considered a bby, let alone a human, therefore (publicizing it or not), it’s legal to “murder” it. & even if abortion was made illegal, more ppl will just get dangerous, bootlegged abortions which can’t be medically monitered & could cause more harm to the women’s body.
anyway, w/freedom of speech: nothing is off limits online
I find your link to Twitter more disturbing, with the article on the mom who tweeted her son’s drowning… REALLY?!
Apparently not.
No, not everything is ok.
I think the internet is a free and open forum and that the 1st amendment protects free speech and that you can post whatever you want. But, I think she made the wrong decision. I think having an abortion will scar her emotionally for life. It would have been worth the risk to her health to keep the baby. Also, I think posting this was a bad decision too, because now she will be reminded all the time by people she doesn’t know how much they hate her. (Which by the way is soooo uncool for the anti-aborrtion people to do.)
@suggestivetongue - Couldn’t this be compared to a murder breaking into someone’s house and executing all that live there whilst live-Tweeting about his actions?
@shanon12 - Abstinence works every single time it’s tried. You can’t say the same about a condom.
@LauraG0929 - Kinda like child pornography?
@bosefius - Why would you ban child pornography? That’s freedom of expression too. Who says you get to draw the line in the sand?
I’ve seen worse on the internet. Also, I had immense admiration for Farrah Fawcett, who put her medical procedures and treatments out here for the public to see. Interesting how these “pro-life” activists have sent this woman death threats. What lovely people they must be, showing zero regard for this real woman’s life in favor of an imaginary potential being.
That said, I think that abortion drug is relatively dangerous and that it’s safer to have the procedure surgically.
It’s her twitter/experience. Worse things have been done. ♥
@bosefius - Yes, that is very true. In keeping with the question, however, and seeing as most were basically saying ‘everything goes’, I felt I would at least pose the thought that there are some things that should not. Even if these things are illegal anyway, it still presents the possibility that the ‘everything goes’ mentality must be given more thought. It’s easy to say it as a blanket statement. I had hoped to get at least a few to think it through a bit more because, no doubt, most of these people would agree with my comment as well, creating what appears to be inconsistancy. That, brings us back to the initial question. Do they really believe that NO topic is off-limits? It all comes down to how specific you want to get. Like I said though, I just wanted to get a a few people that happened on my comment to think.
@Legendairy - Ahhh, I see what you did there
@ProfessorTom - You are really going to go down this road. That’s you, I don’t engage trolls, sorry
@ProfessorTom - If you think that child pornography and freedom of speech are on the same level then I have some serious concerns about you, not to mention you probably need to psychological help. Wtf?
@bosefius - @LauraG0929 - Censorship is censorship. You can’t have it both ways, else the line drawing becomes more restrictive than China’s internet access.
@ProfessorTom - There’s no point in talking to you about this. You are obviously extremely fucked in the head and you’re just trying to start drama. You might want to go to high school for that. Try visiting the counselor while you’re there. Thanks.
@LauraG0929 - No, defend your position. You can’t claim that what this woman was doing is Freedom of Speech and that child pornography is not. They both are expressing something; ergo, the First Amendment applies….unless, of course, you’re willing to concede that not all expression is protected by the First Amendment.
This women is nuts if she thinks her choice to kill her baby is ” OK”
I would love to see what her maker has to say to her for her actions.
I don’t think it should be ok to say things like that on the www so that she can make this out to be something so easy as taking a pill to cover up her wrong doing. Birth controll is not 100% we all know that. You shouldn’t kill a life just to make things easy on yourself! A place was made for people like her and its called hell.
~Loving mother of 3
@MyJudas - I was wondering how long it would be before someone tried to make a personal attack out of this, lol. I am definitely pro-choice, I think most people are confused on when that choice occurs, however: the opportunity for choice comes when the offer of sex is advertised, not after. If she isn’t able to deal with the repercussions of having sex, then she shouldn’t be having it, plain and simple.
As for the publicity she has chosen to bathe herself in, she’s getting just what she wanted: attention. She needs serious psychological help.
@Lady_Kelacy - So a woman should never, ever have sex unless she wants a baby? And if she does have the audacity to have sex, she should die, leaving her disabled child motherless, rather than get an abortion.
Lady, YOU need serious psychological help.
@MyJudas - I am not saying sex is only for procreation, I am saying that sex should only be enjoyed with full knowledge of the repercussions and an ability to withstand them. You are implying a great deal more in my comment than was stated. Perhaps you should try re-reading this when you’ve cooled down a bit and can think a bit clearer.
@Lady_Kelacy - Okay, I see, so you’re saying only women who *can* support a(nother) child should have sex. This woman should have stopped having sex after the first one, because she knew she might not survive another pregnancy. And, maybe you need to think this through a bit more thoroughly, but IF you believe that abortion is not a viable choice (because, as you said, having sex IS the choice to have a baby) then you believe this woman should have died. Is that the case? Because if so, this discussion is over.
@MyJudas - Again, you are missing what I AM saying for what you THINK I’m saying. For someone in her case she should have been more careful, whether she got herself permanently fixed or chose abstinence the road she took clearly wasn’t a “good” one.
Also, I never said that “having sex IS the choice to have a baby”. I said the choice to accept or deny the possible repercussions of sex comes at the time of enticement.
As for whether or not she SHOULD die, I SHOULD NOT make that decision, just as she SHOULD NOT decide to take an innocent life.
That being said, this discussion is over one way or another as you are not arguing in a way to bring about either understanding or resolution.
@Lady_Kelacy - lol, she is not getting your point. just leave it.
@suuperstar - Precisely. *sigh*
@Lady_Kelacy - “the choice to accept or deny the possible repercussions of sex comes at the time of enticement”
Therefore, if a woman gets pregnant and it threatens her life, she made her choice when she decided to have sex.
She doesn’t get to decide that the fetus dies, therefore, she must die.
There is no other way to spin that.
@suggestivetongue - spot on
I don’t think I’d be following that person after that.
Wow Dan you’ve got another topic thats making people sit up and pop! But the truth is that sooner or later, ( which is really now) that this or something like this would have happend on the internet. This does not shock me. However, I do not agree with what this Lady had done. With that being said, I will happily keep my other opinions to myself.
@Lady_Kelacy - I like your view on this subject ^_^ And I don’t believe she’s ever going to understand *face palm*
The internet is the internet. Nothing is off limits.
However if you want to keep a good, classy image… then yes. There is a limit.
Disgusting but predictable and typical/10.
Geez, I’m so stupid about how Twitter works. Basically, if children were following her, then no, her posts weren’t appropriate. But for an adult audience, just because a topic is taboo doesn’t mean she doesn’t have the right to post about it on the Internet. Freedom of speech, man.
Besides, she said that she wanted to tweet her abortion in order to help other women who were going through the same thing. Seems like a perfectly good reason to me.
There are just some things you do not go online tweeting about. This isn’t for facebook either. Or myspace, or any place where it’s truly public. You can have your privacy settings, but it can all slip up if one friend decides to make it public. Suddenly a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend gets word and it’s on the news/in the greater public’s reach. Are we bashing her because of what she chose to do–get support from her friends in one swoop, or are we bashing her because she got an abortion and we don’t agree with it? Not saying that I would be in the mood to Twitter or be close to any kind of technology at a time like hers, but a lot of people are dependent on access to their friends in this way. This was the route she chose. It’s wrong to us, but it seemed like the thing to do in her eyes.
So I’m not agreeing with what she did, but I’m not going to go so low as calling her despicable or ignorant of her own self-respect and consideration. We all think in different ways. And maybe she was just going through a lot of things all at once and really didn’t think…
Her mother must be proud…
Not what I’d consider classy or tactful, but it’s her call. Some people are crude like that, I suppose.
Anything goes on the internet, but the beauty of it is that you can ignore that which you might find offensive.
Nope, nada. But it’s pretty mindblowing how casually people are treating stuff like this now. We can watch [luging] snuff films without flinching, so why not a woman describing her abortion via Twitter?
Well not really. You can type/say anything. But it’s up to the individual to decide what’s wise or not.
freedom of speech, man.
Tweeting what you feel as you kill the life inside you. That is sick, and sad. Very sad.
Wow, people are so SENSITIVE…
How nice of many of you to just judge her as an attention whore instead of actually considering the question of whether it was appropriate to put this up or considering her reasons for doing it. WHY should anything- abortion in this case- have to be shoved under a rug? Let’s just pretend abortion doesn’t happen, and people who have abortions should pretend to be oh-so-ashamed and quiet about it. Yes, shame on you people who found it necessary to get an abortion, you should be in pain and miserable about it forever! And don’t tell anyone about your experience, because that’s just crass! Why can’t we be open? I’m happy for the internet and I’m happy that this woman isn’t catering to society’s expectation that she should shut up about things they don’t want to hear about when they matter to her, when she feels the need to express them. I’m sure some women going through similar things found it extremely valuable, and they can watch it if they so choose. The internet is awesome when it affords us anonymity and when people aren’t anonymous and for talking about mundane things and talking about interesting things and for talking about things people might otherwise find it more difficult to communicate, such as in the case of abortion. Mostly what I find disturbing is the tendency for people to leap quickly and very far from “I don’t support abortion” or “abortion is gross/crass” to “she shouldn’t have put that on the internet”. please do show me how that logical leap makes any sense. it’s quite different than saying, “child pornography is exploitative”. It’s a personal experience and a personal choice made to express this. Child in pornography had no choice or agency in the matter of being exploited and distributed to many. YAY ANGIE! PS, you don’t have to watch it, so stfu!
Although I am not a supporter of abortion, I do believe that people should still be able to freely communicate their thoughts, within reason. The United States guarantees us freedom of speech, but I suppose it can be up to other countries whether they want to censor their internet, although I certainly wouldn’t support that either. Yes, I consider this the same as someone posting grueling details of how they just murdered someone. If someone doesn’t want to read something, there’s a big red X in the top right-hand corner of the screen with their name on it, I suppose.
But she was in the news?! Shouldn’t the news have more important things to bring attention to than a woman Tweeting about her abortion?
@PermanentLeviathonBLur - I love your comment.
That’s cencorship.
@PermanentLeviathonBLur - Well put.
No topic is truly off limits…even if it should be.
I’m not referring to this situation in particular, I mean things like child porn. It shouldn’t exist, but it does.