February 22, 2011
-
Lady Gaga’s Sexy Photoshoot with 6 Year Old Boy
Lady Gaga is coming under fire for her sexy photoshoot with a 6 year old boy.
She is seen in the photoshoot fondling her breast, showing her nipples and pulling her t-shirt down over her lady parts. The boy is only shown with her in a bra not during the other parts.
The video might not be safe for workish depending on where you work.
Do you think the video is too raunchy for a 6-year old boy?
Comments (74)
This is… honestly sick… Oh my gosh, she’s totally ticked me off now.
Ugh!
Nah. She wasn’t doing anything inappropriate when he was there.
Eh. I wasnt disturbed.
It’s probably only objectionable if the boy is gay.
@Celestial_Teapot - LOL yes!
I hope she washed her hands before she held his hand…
Gaga is a dude.
i don’t think six year old boys give a fuck about tits.
She’s gross. But if he was in there when she was not acting like well gross, then I don’t think it matters?
Looked fine to me.
She looks like Marilyn Manson right now.
A child shouldn’t have been around the set for that kind of photo shoot and his parents are probably going to come under fire for it.
So now shes sexually exposing herself to kids? Yay. . . doesn’t that bring her close to being a pedophile? Sorry. xD
lady gaga is always been a weird ducky, I just hope the parents that took there kid there’knew’ she was going to be nude. :S I don’t see the video as that bad. but still, um… There’s a little boy. I wouldn’t be okay if I wasa parent and saw pictures of that and found out there was a kid there.
It wasn’t awful.
OMG I love Terry Richardson’s work. I have a few images from that shoot favorited on my tumblr. Hah! I don’t see the big deal, honestly. He has no idea what’s going on, and NOTHING was going on when she was shooting with him. People are so uptight.
Yes, most definitely there is something wrong. If a woman went to the store dressed this way (in her bra & underwear) would you want your 6 year old to see it? There is an appropriate way and an inappropriate way for us to show ourselves – especially in the presence of children. Unfortunately values & moral are not held with much respect in our world now days.
Flashbacks of Michael Jackson. This kid will either be scarred for life or–pardon my graphicness–j**king off by the time he’s 7
The kid probably didn’t know what was going on. As long as she wasn’t inappropriate with him or while he was there.
also if the kid went to the beach there are plenty of people in swimsuits… she was as covered up as a woman would be in a bikini
I’d be super pissed if I knew my kid had seen that, so yea, I’d say its too raunchy for a six year old. Then again, its Lady Gaga, so I’ve come to expect rather, ummm, lets say risque moves on her part, so I’m not surprised she’s done something like this.
That doesn’t change the fact that I’d still be pissed if my (future) kid(s) ever saw that though.
Personally I don’t give a shit, it’s not my kid… let the parents decide what they want to subject their children too. If you’re going to a Lady Gaga photo shoot you have to expect to see exposed post-op parts, as long as she didn’t lay an egg down his throat as a means of spawning who cares.
I question the judgment of that boy’s parents, unless they’re THAT desperate to make some bucks.
Kid looked terrified.
I would be too.
That little boy is going to grow up to be a tranny.
shes a weirdo- i see her on the LES all the time shes sooo short in real life!
It doesn’t really matter about whether or not the kid was around for the sexually explicit parts. I want to know why he was in it at all? There was not art in putting a six year old in that sexually explicit of a video. It’s basically eye candy to every pedophile out there. Why the hell is the world making it okay to sexually exploit children? It’s like… sex, sex, sex, sex, child, sex, sex, sex, sex. ????? Why is this okay? It’s fucking sick. It makes me sick and it’s getting more and more popular from whole manuals on amazon to stripper poles being sold in children sizes. Children are not sexual objects sick perverted people of the world. They are innocent bystanders to this fucked up world.
*shrugs* She didn’t do anything she shouldn’t have while he was there so I don’t have a problem with it.
My six-year-old self would not be disturbed by this, but I know better than to let my (future) children to see stuff like this.
I find this moderately unpleasant.
I doubt the 6 year old would even be there when the shoot is done. I personally had been in studios helping out before. Such photoshoots usually they’ll bring the kid one side to distract him first before his turn to be shoot. Even if this arrangement is not made I’m quite sure the 6 year old wouldn’t even bother.
yep, she’s an artist alright
could someone just kill her already? I’m so sick of her.
Disgusting. Tasteless. Incredibly inappropriate for a 6 yr old to be exposed to.
@PervyPenguin - I’m six months older than Lady Gaga, and I would be terrified if she used me in a photoshoot. She looks like she could be a granny who tries to be sexy but fails.
I really find her disgusting – for many reasons. And, yes, I think that is too much for a six year old. I would not my six year old child to be exposed to that. Do we want to strip away ALL of the innocence of childhood?
:- if his parents were okay with it, then I’m okay with it, Big phucking deal, people.
“The boy is only shown with her in a bra not during the other parts.”
Sooo… Lady Gaga did a shoot in her normal attire with a 6 year old boy… than later did a sexy photoshoot?Why is this actually an issue?
for a twelve year old, yes. for a six year old, I really don’t think the kid even gives a damn. Come back and tell me if she starts wearing 6 year old as part of her outfit.
How was that posed to the parents? “Oh, hey, ya know, Gaga’s just going to be in there touching herself, and then we’d like a shot with her in bra and panties holding hands with your son.”
My reaction would have been HELL NO. But maybe I’m overzealous that way.
@FallingSafely - A the heck MAN… that’s the whole point really. It’s not that she was or wasn’t doing anything WHILE he was there it’s that the WHOLE thing was sex sex sex sex sex and then… somone has the audacity to add a CHILD??!?!?!?!?! What the heck!?!?
This is seriously controversial? Are you kidding? I suppose if you think an exposed breast around an infant/toddler is perverted, you would think a lady in a bra holding a little boy’s hand is also scandalous. But then you would be an idiot.
@MyTwoCentss - “…Unfortunately values & moral are not held with much respect in our world now days.”
Our values and morals would be more meanignfully reflected in our recognition of basic rights– even for gays and lesbians– and of our tolerance of others right to worship– even for Muslim, than Lady Gaga artistic taste.
I am not surprised. What else can we expect when someone does not have the spirit of God in them?
Well… the title is definitely false- there is nothing sexy about that photo shoot.
I’m just confused to why he was there in the first place.
@BlindSight22 - LMAO…. Good answer!
Is this a normal video for her? This is the first time I’ve seen any video she’s done. Michael Jackson and Madonna kinda came to mind while watching this though….
Anyone else besides me noticed that SUPREME made a great move collaborating with Lady Gaga!? I guess they’re going mainstream.
So… if you think this is inappropriate than I imagine you think taking your child to the beach where women wear less clothing than that is as well? Calm down.
it’s a photoshoot. why is that six year old there? of course she’s gonna do stuff and dress like that in a damn shoot.
and kids are gonna see worse stuff like that. if it were my kid i’d explain to them what was going on and describe the artistic qualities of it. my kids are gonna see stuff like that, so i might as well be there with them when they do instead of pretending that everyone dresses like a damn nun.
Was that sexy? I just thought it looked raunchy.
Utterly repugnant
- Coral
She looks so gross in that video.. Not saying that she was ever really physically attractive to begin with or anything though…
Could be worse. But still, ew.
i don’t understand the point of the little boy? he doesn’t seem to fit in with the um.. theme of the photoshoot…bad artistic direction.
That is a SICK video and I wish I hadn’t watched it. Omg. Where do you get such videos from?
page after page she pulls from madonna’s oeuvre… madonna was/is so much better… on every level…
i thought after seeing an interview for some radio bit i might like gag-gag better. i don’t – spoiled little high brow, in fact
i’m really starting to passionately dislike her…
i can’t believe… ok, lets flip this a little bit… let’s put a 24 year old man in a speedo with all his manhood out there, holding hands with a six year old girl…
that’s not gonna fly too far folks… so if it’s not good for the goose it’s not good for the gander.
and as far as being a prude – i’ll talk dildo’s, pocket p*ssies; i’ll talk masturbation; gay/lesbian; i’ll talk whatever you want to talk – but it won’t involve a kid (i have two, thanks) anywhere near the scene – this is bullsh*t.
that little boy looks 4–not 6.
lady gags is very raunchy, but raunchy sells.
It’s okay, she was born that way!
why did she hire a toddler boy instead of the sexy shirtless manbeast, Jensen ackles
Kinda expected to watch the video and see her wearing the kid. So long as he wasn’t present while her alleged “lady” bits were on display or she was hanging on to her nipples, presumably so they wouldn’t have to get the magnifying glass back out, then I guess it’s OK. Personally though, I fail to see where the kid fits in to the context of what’s apparently a raunchy shoot. And even more personally, Lady GaGa. Ick. Yuck.
Some sicko would get all hot and bothered by her raunch and then go out and find a six year old boy and do to him what he would like to do to Lady GaGa, maybe?
Raunch is “o-k” in it’s proper place, but children should not be included in something like that. Yech!!
Who is she going to involve next in her “sexy” flicks? Infants?
@wrybreadspread - I’m interested to know exactly what you think this has to do with Michael Jackson – did he pose in bra and panties with a kid? I must have missed that tabloid headline.
I guess I missed the part where she showed her nipples.
Anyhoo, it’s funny how Gaga’s impersonation of Madonna even covers Madonna’s scandalous moments. Anyone remember a video Madonna did called “Open Your Heart” where a little boy is trying to get into a strip club to see a scantily clad Madonna do a strip tease? It was a big to-do about nothing then just as this moment is for Gaga now. She’s not naked and neither was Madonna, so people need to chill out.
With that being said, I’m not a big fan of Gaga because I think it’s pretty sad that she has to emulate Madonna’s style and music to the point of blatantly ripping her off. Anybody heard her new song “Born This Way”? A total rip off of Madonna’s “Express Yourself”. That’s the real scandal people should be focusing on, not whether or not some little boy was scarred for life because a woman was holding his hand while dressed in her underwear.
Yes, it is inappropriate for a six year old.
why would a six yr old boy be at a lady gaga photoshoot anyways?
like others have said it’s not my kid but at the same time whether he saw her do those provocative poses or not it’s still disturbing for a little kid to be exposed to.
but the media these days, kids younger and younger are getting exposed to more mature things.
my nieces who at the time were 7 and below knew lady gaga songs and were dancing like her.
it’s kinda shocking but for these days totally believable that you can carry a conversation about a singer with a five year old.
the media is starting to become a poor influence on all of us.
unfortunately i am one of those that are “brainwashed”
wow did not recognized her without all the weird stuff she wears. did not even know she has a real body. thought there would be weird parts to it.
I wouldn’t let Lady Gaga near my dog let alone my child.
@Kenny_Tha_Killa - No. He did grab the nether regions. Numerous times. If I recall, even during his Super Bowl show. And people groused about it, at the time.
@wrybreadspread - Oh, that old non-issue? Yeah, there are lots of uptight people out there.
If he didn’t see her breasts or vulva then I don’t see what the big deal is. Seeing her in a bra and panties is no different from seeing a woman in a bikini.
I don’t understand the point of the boy being there? In every shot where he wasn’t there, Lady Gaga was in a sexual pose of some sort. Where did the boy enter in to the context of the pictures?
@seriously_meredith - He didn’t fit ino the context of the video at all. He was just an “image of innocence,” made useful to the video for it’s shock value in starting discussions like this one and in the selling of the video.
Paedophilia, right now,..is a BIG taboo so the “artists” in the entertainment world think that they are “pushing the limits on our cultural taboos” by including something with a hint of it in their video,..the inclusion of a six year old’s innocence with their exploitation of Gaga’s slutiness.
Both are acceptable in their proper contexts, but the two images certainly don’t belong together!!