Second guy is sexy. Let the shit hit the fan, now.
Oh, and no, men are not more superficial than women.
The second guy is sexy. I’d hit it.
No thanks.
I would need to know FAR more information than that. You know, like, personality, interests, etc. I don’t care about his job, but if he’s a jackass I don’t care if he’s hot. And if he’s a nice awesome dude who is motivated to improve himself, then I don’t care if he’s kinda fat. Morbidly obese would kinda be a turn off, though, I have to admit.
Now what guy would be more likely to cheat on you??
Second guy.
Neither. >.>
The second guy is homosexual with too much plastic surgery, the first guy looks like the Michelin man.
I’m just kinda concerned why the first guy is posing like that…
I’ll be honest, my hubby looks like the first guy. If our marriage ends, I’ll never be in a serious relationship again, so I am not going to care about the guy’s personality. I just want him to be hot.
Superficiality is not sex specific. If anything, women are way more superficial than men.
I’m too old for either of them.
Well if it’s just a date and then a one night stand. Guy number 2. But if I’m marrying someone, they better be stable. Like guy # 1. Marriage- #1 One night stand- #2
Neither!
Funny how there’s less hoopla and more hand wringing on this post vs the first one
Ian Somerhalder looks a bit girly to me, so I pick this handsome lad
if I’m not sexually attracted to him, then we’re just platonic best friends or a sexless marriage, which some people might have as they get older, so I’d pick the hotter one for the best of both worlds, nice hot guy, but I wouldn’t mind if he gets fat later when he is a senior citizen, but when he’s still quite young, I prefer a hotter guy.
Is the first guy just coming off a pregnancy during which he grew a human being in his body? Or is he just lazy and careless about his eating habits?
definitely the third one.
Don’t be so sure. I would probably give both of them a chance, datewise.
Second one
I would never deny my superficiality
unless the second guy is gay, i dont think any women would pick the first one over him.
… You described them as basically the same… Also, I wouldn’t pick either, because I already have a boyfriend.
neither. they’re both gross. hah!
The wise woman would pick the first guy. He’s going to go more out of his way to make her happy… and he’ll deliver her the biggest nest egg when he dies. Judging from what I see, that death will probably be premature anyway. Then she can collect her inheritance and marry the second guy, who will undoubtedly be waiting for just that occurrance, as he’s an obvious gigolo! But when you’re a rich, young widow, what do you care? Forgive me if this observation sounds cynical, but it has many precedents!
@AlluringAddiction - awwww, you’re such a cheeseball. it makes me smile super big though, haha (:
it’s not superficial if you prefer attractive people. it’s how humans are made. it’s only superficial at the point where looks are all that matter to you.
that being said, of course I’d go for the second guy. but if I got to know the first guy and really liked him, I’d start to think he’s attractive. eventually I’d probably think he’s the hottest guy ever just because I love him that much.
Whichever one of them likes candle lit dinners and long walks on the beach…
Errr… wait a minute…
it’s the guy from lostttttttt
as a korean-american growing up in georgia, i’ve come to the conclusion that white women go for looks, while asian women go for success. lol.
i agree with someone above who said superficiality is not sex-specific, but from my observation i feel like women are a lot more forgiving than men. you’d be surprised how much being nice and funny will go a long way with a girl.
Depends on which one is less of an asshole. Also, I tend to go for the chubby guys. I’d probably go with #1 anyway.
I would pick the second guy for a DATE but lets get down to business here…
AFTER one date? Who knows.
I’m too straight for either of them.
If I said the first guy it would be because of his better job a.k.a more money, if I picked the second guy it would be because of his looks, you really can’t win.
in the event you have arranged your center near to the Hermes bags you can nonetheless have it, not contemplating your bank or investment company balance. But, alas, you realize that this could only stay a dream. Unfortunately, you are not just one of people aristocratic girls or somebody whose awesome aunt left her an heirloom.
gotta be honest.
money and appearance are important.
Holy Moly!!! That is like one extreme from the next. Now who have an over weight man vs. I think I might be gay man. Maybe that is just the way I see it. Speaking from experience my first was nice body, good looking, & come to find out pathetically arrogant. Two kids later a kid in a good looking body and nothing to talk about with him. So I see it as: now I have a big man which omg I can’t even explain the feel goods when I am with him. Conversation, etc. is deep, maybe cause it can go deep down in the chubbys. IDK! Moral if you want one?! Is it is what it is!!!! Which you know who and what he is not how he looks. Also a better tactic on life not ” oh you look good!” then “you look good too!”. Ya I am glad its over too. Thanks :+
Neither one would pick me, so it doesn’t matter!
Neither. One is to fat and one is to young. Now put Sam Elliot out there and you got a winner.
The second guy looks like a douchebag. But the first looks extreeeeemely lazy.
I dunno. I guess it depends on other factors.
LOL judging from the comments, I think you were able to prove your point. Most people go with the second, a nonexistent choice, or are hesitant.
@sweetboxc00kie - I agree with your comment… (especially the Asian women going for success haha)
“you’d be surprised how much being nice and funny will go a long way with a girl”
…I agree….but also, you’d be surprised how much looks can influence how nice and funny a guy is as well. =)
I have many thoughts on this. As I am happily married, this is largely hypothetical. While my ideal is someone well-matched with me in appearance (something in between the two examples), I’d rather be with someone less attractive who thinks I’m amazing than someone more attractive who I feel insecure around. BUT if someone is super easy to connect to then I am willing to overlook or work through certain degrees of ugliness or intimidation. I think most people are like that. There are some people who are super shallow and some that are super not shallow, but I think most people want someone generally as attractive as they are, or a little better, and that they are willing to lower their standards a little bit if someone is special. They are also really excited when someone does that for them.
If the accomplish particulars are much from the thousand-dollar worth of Hermes , it is not the genuine thing. in actuality there are nonetheless relatively a few other amazingly important methods to distinguish an reliable just one from the reduced wonderful quality counterfeit.
You can hold admiring replica watch uk within your bank income. If you plan to treat yourself one piece, there are some advice and tips you’d better follow. First, though they are crafted by the original brands, they have been possessed by someone before.
HOT DAMN second one any day sucka any daaaaaay.
There is probably studies that show otherwise, but I think women are more for security than appearance. The first guy is not physically appealing, but if he’s rich and has a good sense of humour and confidence about him, and the second guy lives in his parent’s basement and is shy, who would a woman choose? As a man, I would take an attractive woman unless she was extremely antisocial. I couldn’t care less if she wasn’t funny or lived in a basement. I would never take an obese woman. That is the difference.
2nd, I mean why not? Me & the 1st could be good friends..
I’m being completely honest here. I’d pick the first guy. I’ve been with guys who look like that and there is NO PROBLEM with it. all that matters is their personality and their character.
The second guy would only get a woman’s attention. She’d be like “Woah, he’s pretty hot.”, but that’s it.
Judging by how a woman thinks, let’s say that Guy #1 exhibits strong body language and is able to get a woman to crack up laughing like crazy, whereas Guy #2 is kind of shy and nervous and he asks boring, routine questions such as “Where are you going to school?”, “What is your major?”, “Do you have a boyfriend?”, etc. While Guy #2 LOOKS more attractive, the woman would pick Guy #1 without much hesitation.
Well I am not looking for a great job so I will choose the second guy
i think phophorikike (did I spell that right?) I think he’s cute. Serena Dante is not that pretty. She’s an attention whore, likes to bash christians, and cheats on her boyfriend with his consent. She even had sex with his dad and older brother. She is from Romania, and it is cutom there.
There is very little magic in the biology of love. If the first man hits all the triggers in a women he will get the girl. It’s very simple and looks have nothing, NOTHING to do with it except give you a few free fuck-ups in the beginning.
Somewhere in between?
Second guy. Why didn’t you describe him as mean and without a job. The answer would then be very different.
That would depend on the situation. Duh (ha ha). If I was good friends with one and not the other, and they both asked me on a date, its likely that whichever one I was friends with I would choose (if I could only have one date). If I didn’t know either of them, I’m sure I would pick the second guy, but at the same time people look a lot different with their shirts on, and I’ve had a crush on a few guys like the first one. And the job doesn’t really matter. This is definitely situational.
Maybe if the first one kept his shirt on because the second one is much too metro for my taste.
Men are not more superficial than women… Sometimes girls are more actually…
And I wouldn’t pick either… the second one is too skinny but he is handsome. And I would pick by their actions… looks mean nothing when it really comes down to it.
You said that the second one was nice. So if he has a good sense of humor, I’d go for the eye candy. I could care less about the job.
If i were single – I’d probably go on one date with both of them and see who I got along with better. They are both successful, and oddly enough I’m normally attracted to teddy bear types (like my hubby) – but the second guy kinda reminds me of Tom welling (Superman is awesome too).
My hubby is awesome though, and Im not dating, so it doesnt matter! =D
I’m a guy, and I’m totally straight, so I wouldn’t be picking either of them.
It’s not superficial to want to be with someone you’re attracted to. Besides, the prettiest guy in the world has nothing on the prettiest girl in the world. Girls always go out with guys who are less attractive than them ;P
But seriously, I fail to see why girls have to want to go out with a guy who doesn’t take care of themselves, when a guy wouldn’t want a girl to not take care of themselves.
definitely the hottest commenter =P
Well, women who want the best protection typically go for the one they most seriously need protection from. Go to hell and marry the devil rather than the closest thing to heaven on earth with someone who at least tries to be a saint; not in the kiss or kick everyone’s butt superficial way. The best immediate protection is also the most immediate and dangerous threat. The other way doesn’t even let the threat know you exist.
How about neither. o.O
would choosing someone for their job be less superficial? i don’t get what you’re trying to get at…
and really, would guys even care about what a woman does for a living if they were female equivalents to the pictures you showed? i think your point is weak, and doesn’t make much sense. obviously people go for the more attractive person if personality is not taken into consideration. the only thing you’ve said about both of these men is that they are nice.
i’d probably do the second one, but i feel like he would want me to put on a strap on.
The second guy’s looks will fade and leave nothing but a hollow shell. The first guy has developed good qualities that will last a lifetime so he’s my pick and I’d sweet talk him into joining a gym together.
Everyone’s superficial, Dan.
Lol, I am getting married to the first guy, but I’ll be visualizing the second one :p
I wouldn’t pick either one of them!
You put Ian Somerhalder (Vampire Diaries and Lost) against an anonymous fat guy???? Are you kidding? I would “do,” never mind “date” Ian Somerhalder in a second! If that makes me superficial, so be it! And I wouldn’t care if it was a one-nighter and he’s an asshole. (ps: whoever said he’s gay, is wroooongg!)
I like tits… so the first guy. Second guy has better pictures on the internet to have picked from… All I like about him is his eyes.
Also, I used to look like guy #1 but now, not so much… Fat guys get so much flack for being fat, whether they’re “obese” or “excusably” fat is irrelevant. Some girls, much like guys, are chubby chasers
Honestly, the first one. There is no comparison of a hot average guy and a terrific normal looking guy.
Exactly dude. People are so full of crap that say that it doesnt matter. Give me a friggin break. Liars.
There are plenty of beautiful people on the inside that arent fat on the outside.
Two sides to every coin.
I see someone very overweight and I see someone who lacks self-control, who is unhealthy, who doesnt like being active, and may be a little irresponsible. While we do focus a lot on appearance, I think it’s because appearance reflects personality and character.
The job part… isn’t that superficial as well? You could claim they’re in it for the money, or.. you could say that someone who has landed a solid, well-paying job is more likely to be self-motivated, intelligent, responsible, or hard-working.
Well if they’re both nice guys, it’s kind of a difficult decision, isn’t it?
And I’d leave the job out for the time being. It’s only one date. But they both seem like very nice people.Then again, if we were to go by Elaine Benes’s logic, I’d have to choose the first guy. ”This friend of a friend knows this banker guy, he’s, I don’t know, 30 years…UNBELIEVABLY gorgeous, of course he’s gay.” To be completely honest, I would prefer the second guy. But I wouldn’t snub the first guy, either. If one of them is actually a lot more undesirable than the other, then that’s the way I would go!
The 2nd. I’m always outside. Running, walking, going on nature trails, etc. The first guy wouldn’t be able to do that stuff with me (just going by the picture, of course).
Let’s be honest: we’d all pick the second one. But as someone else said, he looks gay.
I’d say screw it and go out with one of the hot chicks from the post below this one.
ewww… at least the first guy beat anorexia….
if the first guy is nicer, him. idc about their job, it’s not their job to take care of me. but if the second guy is a dick, no thanks.
First of all, I’d like them both better with shirts on.
Secondly, I prefer the first guy. The second guy is too model-ish “I’m too sexy for my shirt” type. I’m always afraid that type of super-good-looking guy will have an attitude of “of course you want me, so you’ll do what I want to get me”. Even if he is otherwise a “nice guy”.
Thirdly, I’ll actually take guy #3 IE my boyfriend. first guy’s description also basically describes him, but “nice guy and good job” aren’t the only things I look for.
Which one has more money?
yah. not the first guy =/
Since no one has said it….. I’d pick Rob_of_the_Sky. Definitely.
Neither! The second guy is a skinny bitch!
From Sunrise and sunset,permanence is the river of time. Back in the million years ago, humans have learned to observe and control the time of the operation of the law. From the corona to the atomic clock, the human mastery of time and measurement methods had changed more and more science, sophisticated. watches replica watches replica real development is from the beginning of the 16th century and spread knowledge of science and technology. With the timer design, improvement, manufacture and spread, the clock have being started around our side and along with the progress of human society have being progressed. It not only improve our way of life, but aosl their own is fine art and Priceless. As watch enthusiasts should know that clock follow the time’s the tracesin in the footsteps.
Comments (96)
The second guy. I don’t care about his job.
First wow!!!
The second guy is clearly gay…
You’re really still going on about this Dan? Thats kind of sad.
@MomGoneMadd - HAHAHAH <3
Let it go Dan
And the first guy kind of looks like the guy I’m with now, body wise. So you tell me.
They’re both way too young for me
I pick THIS guy.
Second guy is sexy. Let the shit hit the fan, now.
Oh, and no, men are not more superficial than women.
The second guy is sexy. I’d hit it.
No thanks.
I would need to know FAR more information than that. You know, like, personality, interests, etc. I don’t care about his job, but if he’s a jackass I don’t care if he’s hot. And if he’s a nice awesome dude who is motivated to improve himself, then I don’t care if he’s kinda fat. Morbidly obese would kinda be a turn off, though, I have to admit.
Now what guy would be more likely to cheat on you??
Second guy.
Neither. >.>
The second guy is homosexual with too much plastic surgery, the first guy looks like the Michelin man.
I’m just kinda concerned why the first guy is posing like that…
I’ll be honest, my hubby looks like the first guy. If our marriage ends, I’ll never be in a serious relationship again, so I am not going to care about the guy’s personality. I just want him to be hot.
Superficiality is not sex specific. If anything, women are way more superficial than men.
I’m too old for either of them.
Well if it’s just a date and then a one night stand. Guy number 2. But if I’m marrying someone, they better be stable. Like guy # 1. Marriage- #1 One night stand- #2
Neither!
Funny how there’s less hoopla and more hand wringing on this post vs the first one
Ian Somerhalder looks a bit girly to me, so I pick this handsome lad
http://leisureblogs.chicagotribune.com/.a/6a00d8341c58f853ef01538e5df952970b-800wi
if I’m not sexually attracted to him, then we’re just platonic best friends or a sexless marriage, which some people might have as they get older, so I’d pick the hotter one for the best of both worlds, nice hot guy, but I wouldn’t mind if he gets fat later when he is a senior citizen, but when he’s still quite young, I prefer a hotter guy.
Is the first guy just coming off a pregnancy during which he grew a human being in his body? Or is he just lazy and careless about his eating habits?
definitely the third one.
Don’t be so sure. I would probably give both of them a chance, datewise.
Second one
I would never deny my superficiality
unless the second guy is gay, i dont think any women would pick the first one over him.
@phosphorickike - Lol! XD
… You described them as basically the same… Also, I wouldn’t pick either, because I already have a boyfriend.
neither. they’re both gross. hah!
The wise woman would pick the first guy. He’s going to go more out of his way to make her happy… and he’ll deliver her the biggest nest egg when he dies. Judging from what I see, that death will probably be premature anyway. Then she can collect her inheritance and marry the second guy, who will undoubtedly be waiting for just that occurrance, as he’s an obvious gigolo! But when you’re a rich, young widow, what do you care? Forgive me if this observation sounds cynical, but it has many precedents!
@AlluringAddiction - awwww, you’re such a cheeseball. it makes me smile super big though, haha (:
it’s not superficial if you prefer attractive people. it’s how humans are made. it’s only superficial at the point where looks are all that matter to you.
that being said, of course I’d go for the second guy. but if I got to know the first guy and really liked him, I’d start to think he’s attractive. eventually I’d probably think he’s the hottest guy ever just because I love him that much.
Whichever one of them likes candle lit dinners and long walks on the beach…
Errr… wait a minute…
it’s the guy from lostttttttt
as a korean-american growing up in georgia, i’ve come to the conclusion that white women go for looks, while asian women go for success. lol.
i agree with someone above who said superficiality is not sex-specific, but from my observation i feel like women are a lot more forgiving than men. you’d be surprised how much being nice and funny will go a long way with a girl.
Depends on which one is less of an asshole. Also, I tend to go for the chubby guys. I’d probably go with #1 anyway.
I would pick the second guy for a DATE but lets get down to business here…
AFTER one date? Who knows.
I’m too straight for either of them.
If I said the first guy it would be because of his better job a.k.a more money, if I picked the second guy it would be because of his looks, you really can’t win.
in the event you have arranged your center near to the Hermes bags you can nonetheless have it, not contemplating your bank or investment company balance. But, alas, you realize that this could only stay a dream. Unfortunately, you are not just one of people aristocratic girls or somebody whose awesome aunt left her an heirloom.
gotta be honest.
money and appearance are important.
Holy Moly!!! That is like one extreme from the next. Now who have an over weight man vs. I think I might be gay man. Maybe that is just the way I see it. Speaking from experience my first was nice body, good looking, & come to find out pathetically arrogant. Two kids later a kid in a good looking body and nothing to talk about with him. So I see it as: now I have a big man which omg I can’t even explain the feel goods when I am with him. Conversation, etc. is deep, maybe cause it can go deep down in the chubbys. IDK! Moral if you want one?! Is it is what it is!!!! Which you know who and what he is not how he looks. Also a better tactic on life not ” oh you look good!” then “you look good too!”. Ya I am glad its over too. Thanks :+
Neither one would pick me, so it doesn’t matter!
Neither. One is to fat and one is to young. Now put Sam Elliot out there and you got a winner.
The second guy looks like a douchebag. But the first looks extreeeeemely lazy.
I dunno. I guess it depends on other factors.
LOL judging from the comments, I think you were able to prove your point. Most people go with the second, a nonexistent choice, or are hesitant.
@sweetboxc00kie - I agree with your comment… (especially the Asian women going for success haha)
“you’d be surprised how much being nice and funny will go a long way with a girl”
…I agree….but also, you’d be surprised how much looks can influence how nice and funny a guy is as well. =)
I have many thoughts on this. As I am happily married, this is largely hypothetical. While my ideal is someone well-matched with me in appearance (something in between the two examples), I’d rather be with someone less attractive who thinks I’m amazing than someone more attractive who I feel insecure around. BUT if someone is super easy to connect to then I am willing to overlook or work through certain degrees of ugliness or intimidation. I think most people are like that. There are some people who are super shallow and some that are super not shallow, but I think most people want someone generally as attractive as they are, or a little better, and that they are willing to lower their standards a little bit if someone is special. They are also really excited when someone does that for them.
If the accomplish particulars are much from the thousand-dollar worth of Hermes , it is not the genuine thing. in actuality there are nonetheless relatively a few other amazingly important methods to distinguish an reliable just one from the reduced wonderful quality counterfeit.
You can hold admiring replica watch uk within your bank income. If you plan to treat yourself one piece, there are some advice and tips you’d better follow. First, though they are crafted by the original brands, they have been possessed by someone before.
HOT DAMN second one any day sucka any daaaaaay.
There is probably studies that show otherwise, but I think women are more for security than appearance. The first guy is not physically appealing, but if he’s rich and has a good sense of humour and confidence about him, and the second guy lives in his parent’s basement and is shy, who would a woman choose? As a man, I would take an attractive woman unless she was extremely antisocial. I couldn’t care less if she wasn’t funny or lived in a basement. I would never take an obese woman. That is the difference.
2nd, I mean why not? Me & the 1st could be good friends..
I’m being completely honest here. I’d pick the first guy. I’ve been with guys who look like that and there is NO PROBLEM with it. all that matters is their personality and their character.
The second guy would only get a woman’s attention. She’d be like “Woah, he’s pretty hot.”, but that’s it.
Judging by how a woman thinks, let’s say that Guy #1 exhibits strong body language and is able to get a woman to crack up laughing like crazy, whereas Guy #2 is kind of shy and nervous and he asks boring, routine questions such as “Where are you going to school?”, “What is your major?”, “Do you have a boyfriend?”, etc. While Guy #2 LOOKS more attractive, the woman would pick Guy #1 without much hesitation.
The first guy seems really happy about himself
Låna pengar trots anmärkningar
Well I am not looking for a great job so I will choose the second guy
i think phophorikike (did I spell that right?) I think he’s cute. Serena Dante is not that pretty. She’s an attention whore, likes to bash christians, and cheats on her boyfriend with his consent. She even had sex with his dad and older brother. She is from Romania, and it is cutom there.
There is very little magic in the biology of love. If the first man hits all the triggers in a women he will get the girl. It’s very simple and looks have nothing, NOTHING to do with it except give you a few free fuck-ups in the beginning.
Somewhere in between?
Second guy. Why didn’t you describe him as mean and without a job. The answer would then be very different.
That would depend on the situation. Duh (ha ha). If I was good friends with one and not the other, and they both asked me on a date, its likely that whichever one I was friends with I would choose (if I could only have one date). If I didn’t know either of them, I’m sure I would pick the second guy, but at the same time people look a lot different with their shirts on, and I’ve had a crush on a few guys like the first one. And the job doesn’t really matter. This is definitely situational.
Maybe if the first one kept his shirt on because the second one is much too metro for my taste.
Men are not more superficial than women… Sometimes girls are more actually…
And I wouldn’t pick either… the second one is too skinny but he is handsome. And I would pick by their actions… looks mean nothing when it really comes down to it.
You said that the second one was nice. So if he has a good sense of humor, I’d go for the eye candy. I could care less about the job.
If i were single – I’d probably go on one date with both of them and see who I got along with better. They are both successful, and oddly enough I’m normally attracted to teddy bear types (like my hubby) – but the second guy kinda reminds me of Tom welling (Superman is awesome too).
My hubby is awesome though, and Im not dating, so it doesnt matter! =D
I’m a guy, and I’m totally straight, so I wouldn’t be picking either of them.
It’s not superficial to want to be with someone you’re attracted to. Besides, the prettiest guy in the world has nothing on the prettiest girl in the world. Girls always go out with guys who are less attractive than them ;P
But seriously, I fail to see why girls have to want to go out with a guy who doesn’t take care of themselves, when a guy wouldn’t want a girl to not take care of themselves.
definitely the hottest commenter =P
Well, women who want the best protection typically go for the one they most seriously need protection from. Go to hell and marry the devil rather than the closest thing to heaven on earth with someone who at least tries to be a saint; not in the kiss or kick everyone’s butt superficial way. The best immediate protection is also the most immediate and dangerous threat. The other way doesn’t even let the threat know you exist.
How about neither. o.O
would choosing someone for their job be less superficial? i don’t get what you’re trying to get at…
and really, would guys even care about what a woman does for a living if they were female equivalents to the pictures you showed? i think your point is weak, and doesn’t make much sense. obviously people go for the more attractive person if personality is not taken into consideration. the only thing you’ve said about both of these men is that they are nice.
i’d probably do the second one, but i feel like he would want me to put on a strap on.
@STEVENPILL - LOL. Best answer yet.
The second guy’s looks will fade and leave nothing but a hollow shell. The first guy has developed good qualities that will last a lifetime so he’s my pick and I’d sweet talk him into joining a gym together.
Everyone’s superficial, Dan.
Lol, I am getting married to the first guy, but I’ll be visualizing the second one :p
I wouldn’t pick either one of them!
You put Ian Somerhalder (Vampire Diaries and Lost) against an anonymous fat guy???? Are you kidding?
I would “do,” never mind “date” Ian Somerhalder in a second! If that makes me superficial, so be it! And I wouldn’t care if it was a one-nighter and he’s an asshole. (ps: whoever said he’s gay, is wroooongg!)
for more pics of Ian to drool over: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0813812/
I like tits… so the first guy.
Second guy has better pictures on the internet to have picked from… All I like about him is his eyes.
Also, I used to look like guy #1 but now, not so much… Fat guys get so much flack for being fat, whether they’re “obese” or “excusably” fat is irrelevant. Some girls, much like guys, are chubby chasers
Honestly, the first one. There is no comparison of a hot average guy and a terrific normal looking guy.
Exactly dude. People are so full of crap that say that it doesnt matter. Give me a friggin break. Liars.
There are plenty of beautiful people on the inside that arent fat on the outside.
Two sides to every coin.
I see someone very overweight and I see someone who lacks self-control, who is unhealthy, who doesnt like being active, and may be a little irresponsible. While we do focus a lot on appearance, I think it’s because appearance reflects personality and character.
The job part… isn’t that superficial as well? You could claim they’re in it for the money, or.. you could say that someone who has landed a solid, well-paying job is more likely to be self-motivated, intelligent, responsible, or hard-working.
Well if they’re both nice guys, it’s kind of a difficult decision, isn’t it?
And I’d leave the job out for the time being. It’s only one date. But they both seem like very nice people.Then again, if we were to go by Elaine Benes’s logic, I’d have to choose the first guy. ”This friend of a friend knows this banker guy, he’s, I don’t know, 30 years…UNBELIEVABLY gorgeous, of course he’s gay.”
To be completely honest, I would prefer the second guy. But I wouldn’t snub the first guy, either. If one of them is actually a lot more undesirable than the other, then that’s the way I would go!
The 2nd. I’m always outside. Running, walking, going on nature trails, etc. The first guy wouldn’t be able to do that stuff with me (just going by the picture, of course).
Let’s be honest: we’d all pick the second one. But as someone else said, he looks gay.
I’d say screw it and go out with one of the hot chicks from the post below this one.
ewww… at least the first guy beat anorexia….
if the first guy is nicer, him. idc about their job, it’s not their job to take care of me.
but if the second guy is a dick, no thanks.
First of all, I’d like them both better with shirts on.
Secondly, I prefer the first guy. The second guy is too model-ish “I’m too sexy for my shirt” type. I’m always afraid that type of super-good-looking guy will have an attitude of “of course you want me, so you’ll do what I want to get me”. Even if he is otherwise a “nice guy”.
Thirdly, I’ll actually take guy #3 IE my boyfriend. first guy’s description also basically describes him, but “nice guy and good job” aren’t the only things I look for.
Which one has more money?
yah. not the first guy =/
Since no one has said it….. I’d pick Rob_of_the_Sky. Definitely.
Neither! The second guy is a skinny bitch!
From Sunrise and sunset,permanence is the river of time. Back in the million years ago, humans have learned to observe and control the time of the operation of the law. From the corona to the atomic clock, the human mastery of time and measurement methods had changed more and more science, sophisticated. watches replica watches replica real development is from the beginning of the 16th century and spread knowledge of science and technology. With the timer design, improvement, manufacture and spread, the clock have being started around our side and along with the progress of human society have being progressed. It not only improve our way of life, but aosl their own is fine art and Priceless. As watch enthusiasts should know that clock follow the time’s the tracesin in the footsteps.