September 16, 2012
-
Kate Topless
The wife of Prince William is embarrassed as topless photos of her were published on several websites and released in a few newspapers. (I think she was warming up for my Save the Boobs campaign).
She was in a private area. The photos were taken from a distance and over a fence. Here is the link: Link
Some are saying her privacy was violated.
Was Kate’s privacy violated?
Comments (51)
When you’re in the public eye your titties belong to the people.
If it was me I wouldn’t mind if someone was on distant hill snapping photos of me doing my post-shower sexy dance.
However other people get all touchy about being seen in the nude, I don’t get it, but I suppose by the general unspoken rule of privacy, it was violated.
Well, it was in a private place and not out in public. So yes, her privacy was violated.
william was also topless… not sure if anyone caught that.
Saw her tits; wasn’t impressed. 1/5 stars
History repeats itself. You’d think they’d learn.
Yes.
Well crap nobody is beating my door down to get a naked photo of my old saggy boob. I am jealous:):)
Yes it was a violation of her privacy but that is the price of fame. At least she didn”t strip and shake it like her royal brother in law.
Whoever took the photos should get the same treatment as the scumbag who took the peephole videos of Erin Andrews.
She was at a private home– not even some hotel where other people or creepy photographers would be expected– a person’s home. Definite invasion of privacy. There should be a level of confidence that such a situation should be safe from scandal-seekers, but when you’re famous, that’s not always promised.
Pics or it didn’t happen… oh, wait…
Yeah, but that’s what you get for being married to the prince.
She was topless in a private area. her privacy was violated because what was once private is now public with out her approval.
We all know that the royals have always violated other people’s privacy to a greater extent than taking pictures of people by surprise, but it is still wrong to take photos of them without their consent..By their very presence and costs these royals are actually invading society as much as those who are invading them..
what a jip. princesses and other royalty are suppose to live in a tall castle with 5 story high brick walls and sharpshooters guarding the area, not those idle nutcracker soldiers!
Umm, yes? For the love of God, it’s not like she leaked cell phone pictures. For once it actually wasn’t her fault. She kind of has the right to be topless in private.
Oh No!!! She has boobs.I get why they are upset, it was private. I find it hard to believe though that she never flashed anyone in her drunken party days.
“Some are saying her privacy was violated…”
Is she?
Nobody has privacy in this world anyways, regardless. She knew what she was getting in to when she married the prince.And she knows damn well that if she’s going to be topless, there are going to be people there to snap it.
If you’re in a place that can be seen from another place (as in a deck, balcony, or other area of your home with windows), expect that someone can see you naked if you’re naked.
Easy solution? Be a never-nude.
Yes, it was a total invasion of her privacy, and she has every right to be upset about it.
But – what is making ME a bit pissed, is the way it’s being compared to the hounding Princess Diana put up with from the paparazzi (even though I know she courted the press herself avidly when it suited her).
Having a long-distance photo taken while sunbathing topless is NOTHING like being forced at high speed into the wall of a tunnel and having your chest splattered open by photographers who just don’t know when to give up.
Invasion of privacy? Yes
But she pretty much agreed to forfeit her privacy by marrying a prince.
She shouldve known better then to be topless outdoors if she didn’t want to risk this.
did anyone get any pics of prince william’s penis?
Why is catching a photo of a tit any more of a privacy violation than catching a photo of a hand?
Yes, she was at a private home. She wasn’t flaunting herself in public.
@twilike - now that…i’d like to see lol
There nudity is not more than anybody else…lets celebrate human beauty and the fact that we are creatures of nature. If you don’t want nude pictures then undress in a private room like most people do.
Who cares? Why this ridiculous preoccupation with the “royals”? With all that is going on in this crazy world ….. Who has time to give a flip if some young married woman sunbathes topless with her husband in a private residence.
Let’s spend our collective energy discussing women who have lost their breasts – or lives to breast cancer.
Bit of a flurry in the press – taking liberties like this is an invasion of privacy and is downright skullduggery. A money maker it seems.
Yes, but at least she wasn’t paid to put her clothes back on (the story of my life….)
hello
Click on the websites Here you have the only true religion believe faith
THE BOOK OF GOD( ALLAH)
http://www.kuranikerim.com/english/m_indexe.htm
when you open the website click numbers and the names to open
THE ONLY ONE TRUTH RELIGION OF GOD
http://www.beautifulislam.net/tellmemore/true_religion.htm
http://www.islam-guide.comwww.islamreligion.com
THE MIRACLES THE HOLY QURAN ARE ON THESE WEBSITES
http://www.islamicmedicine.org/medmiraclesofquran/medmiracleseng.htm http://www.islamcan.com/miracles/index.shtml
http://www.islam-guide.com/ch3-8.htm
Allah the only one God and His nameshttp://whoisallah.blogcu.com
http://thenamesofallah.blogcu.com
Prophet Muhammad the last prophet of God(Allah) and the best human in the world
http://sharingknowledgeofislam.blogspot.com/2010/02/collection-of-best-hadith-reminders.html
http://www.famousquotes.com/author/prophet-muhammad/
http://www.islamfortoday.com/athar16.htm
http://islammyreligion.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/prophet-muhammad-the-best-man-in-the-world/
http://www.wefound.org/texts/Muhammad_files/Muhammad.htm
http://tribune.com.ng/index.php/muslim-sermon/18381-prophet-muhammed-an-example-of-best-character-for-mankind
http://www.alsiraj.net/English/misc/nonmuslims/html/page27.html
The Amazing Quran
http://theamazingquran.blogcu.com/the-amazing-quran/11164929
That just means that they are in danger. If someone can get through to take a picture, then they can get through to do other things too.
I guess she won’t stand a chance, as other celebrities also get photographed while sunbathing topless .. And i’ve never heard of any of their complaints result in not revealing pictures. She could’ve seen it coming ..
PS: Yes (OFCOURSE) i’m curious about her breasts
So a young woman sunbathed topless at a private home with her husband.
Yes, I’d say the photos are a violation of privacy, but people making a big deal either way about them are the ones to look out for.
Yes, it was. I would be mortified.
yeah. a photo taken from a mile away is an invasion of her privacy. that being said, the british monarchy needs to get over themselves and stop being so damn pompous.
photos should not be taken without warning, and not published without permission of the person, no matter where he or she is or what he or she does.
Yes, her privacy was violated. I don’t care if you’re a famous person or an ordinary person, no one deserves to have stupid paparazzi snapping pictures of you and spread all over the Internet.
Absolutely.
Yes.
Of course they violated her privacy. Nobody has the right to take photos of or publish pictures of someone else’s private parts without written permission. They should be jailed.
they showed a photo of the old Queen and under it it read,”there is a reason that the Queen has never had topless photos-yeah! she’s as old as my mom.
They crossed the line, especially since they/she thought she had privacy. Papparazzi knew better, but didn’t care. Greed, money and sex sells. But it shouldn’t with certain people.
Famous or not famous, she was in her own private location. Yes, her privacy was violated.
What boobs?
They were taken over a fence!? Hell yes her privacy was violated. In fact, this is illegal in England as far as I know.
Her privacy was violated, but having said that, privacy is pretty much a thing of the past anyway. Unless you are inside a building, there is a camera that can see you, and even in a building, it’s iffy.
With the paparazzi having been partly blamed for Princess Diana’s death, the public & press in Europe are very sensitive to privacy issue of their dear royals. Personally, I’m ok with the US position that as long as you’re not trespassing, any photo taken with any lens is fair game. Plus, we just saw Prince Harry naked in Vegas, heh heh, and no-one screamed “lawsuit” over that. And, who cares about Kate’s little titties, anyway???
She should’ve known what she was getting into, marrying a prince. She may have been at a ‘private home’ but, she should’ve made sure she was concealed.
That’s what she gets for being naked outside, and famous.
Can these photogs refrain just for professionalism?
Did she get upset when her wedding was seen all over the place? No. Did she get upset any other time her picture has been in magazines, tv, Internet? No. From my understanding, the pictures were taken outside, if she wanted privacy, she would have found a normal man to marry.
Let me see her tits first and then i will let you know if her privacy is violated, so send me the link where her tits can be seen.